- Black man films ‘Crosswalk Cathy’ yelling racist slurs at him Tuesday 6:47 PM
- Guerrilla artists turn John Oliver billboard ad into right-wing meme Tuesday 4:20 PM
- Netflix lines up unnecessarily good cast for ‘Green Eggs and Ham’ Tuesday 3:48 PM
- Netflix drops trailer for Mötley Crüe biopic ‘The Dirt’—and the cast is wild Tuesday 3:41 PM
- QAnon’s repetitive posts are alienating even his most ardent supporters Tuesday 3:36 PM
- Noah Cyrus cries on Instagram after Lil Xan’s baby announcement Tuesday 2:26 PM
- The ‘Well yes, but actually no’ meme is here to help you explain things Tuesday 12:07 PM
- Judge orders Roger Stone to appear in court after his Instagram post Tuesday 11:24 AM
- I worked with the migrant caravan—and Trump is the cause of his national emergency Tuesday 11:09 AM
- How to watch Liverpool vs. Bayern Munich online for free Tuesday 11:08 AM
- ‘Patriot Act’ volume 2 proves Hasan Minhaj is the next big star of the news-comedy genre Tuesday 11:01 AM
- ‘Friends From College’ canceled after 2 seasons at Netflix Tuesday 10:53 AM
- Allow your wallet to be your spirit guide during this rad anime sale Tuesday 10:43 AM
- Man stages fake DUI trial to propose to girlfriend, and people are asking why Tuesday 10:40 AM
- Bernie Sanders’ website full of 404s on launch day Tuesday 10:23 AM
Your data might outlive you.
When most people think of the companies that are most likely to violate their right to privacy, their mind will likely jump immediately to their smartphone, thinking of Facebook following them around the Internet or Google stalking them in meatspace. Or maybe they’ll think of federal agencies like the National Security Agency, or perhaps they’ll even think of their local police department. Who they probably don’t think about is RadioShack.
The defunct electronics retailer, however, amassed a huge collection of data about their shoppers, from email addresses and physical addresses to shopping habits. All told, RadioShack actually possesses 13 million email addresses and 65 million physical addresses, not to mention the spending habits of all of their 117 million customers. While those totals might pale in comparison to the untold troves of Silicon Valley’s giants, it’s no small change.
This made them an oddity in corporate America. Nearly every major retailer sells off private customer data in bulk, and as RadioShack’s odd case shows, those that promise not to sell your information just might turn to all that sweet, sweet data when the chips are down. It’s incredibly unlikely that RadioShack shoppers of the last few decades had any idea their data was of any worth to the retailer, but consumers should be aware of the immortality their information can give them.
You could be forgiven for assuming your data goes down with the company that collected it, but clearly it’s too valuable an asset to completely destroy. As the “surveillance economy” marches forward, this should especially be a concern in the digital age. What happens, for example, when/if struggling game studio Zynga files for bankruptcy? At its height, the company had 300 million active users who had freely given apps like Farmville access to their Facebook account, location info, and Internet habits through tracking cookies. Likewise, what happens to all the information Myspace, which once had 76 million users, has collected when that company inevitably falls?
The Web is becoming littered with once-popular giants who now, like RadioShack, hold millions of users’ data as their most valuable asset. As the retail world struggles to survive against heated competition with Walmart and online retailers, we might be watching the future of how customer data is handled after a company ceases to exist. And retailers likely have more information on you than you might think.
The micromarketing tactics of companies like Target and Starbucks mean closely—very closely—collecting information from customers, including shopping data and even their physical location in the store. Walmart, the world’s largest retailer, even goes so far as to call itself “a technology company,” citing its bid to track users to “streamline” their experience in the stores and on its website. Many retailers have even begun to track customer movements within a store through their cell phone.
So even stores you’ve only entered can now collect data from you, mostly in the name of finding new ways to advertise at you. While that can sound harmless enough—polls consistently show most Americans prefer convenience over any expectation of privacy—that data can now live past the existence of the company, meaning your personal information could one day be in the hands of a company you might not trust as much as RadioShack or, for that matter, Zynga and Myspace. Like RadioShack, It could even end up under the control of a shady hedge fund with a history of buying defunct companies and struggling to turn them around—meaning your data will then be sold off again and again and again, likely outliving even you.
Screengrab via Radioshack/YouTube
Gillian Branstetter is a reporter and essayist who specializes in the intersection of technology, LGBTQ issues, and privacy. In April 2018, she joined the National Center for Transgender Equality as a media relations manager.