- How to check if Yahoo owes you $358 5 Years Ago
- How to stream Bears vs. Redskins on Monday Night Football Today 7:00 AM
- What are the best alternatives to the electoral college? Today 6:30 AM
- The best PS4 games you can’t play anywhere else Today 6:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 Emmy Awards Today 5:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 5 Today 4:00 AM
- Former developer at software company deletes his code to protest its ties to ICE Saturday 4:21 PM
- A mysterious website is doxing Hong Kong protesters and journalists Saturday 1:44 PM
- The best ‘Skyrim’ followers and how to get them Saturday 1:26 PM
- Why Joel Osteen gets cyberbullied every time Houston floods Saturday 12:40 PM
- How to stream Jets vs. Patriots in Week 3 Saturday 12:39 PM
- 10 indie dating simulator games you should be playing Saturday 12:31 PM
- How to stream Packers vs. Broncos in Week 3 Saturday 12:14 PM
- Saudi crown prince’s former adviser suspended from Twitter Saturday 11:57 AM
- How to stream Cowboys vs. Dolphins in Week 3 Saturday 11:57 AM
Pick-up artists explain how they could have prevented the UCSB shootings
Elliot Rodger didn’t kill people because he was crazy and hated women. He just needed “game.”
In the wake of the University of California at Santa Barbara shootings on Friday night, people were left with a wide range of emotions: sadness, because seven lives were needlessly cut short; anger, at 22-year-old shooting suspect Elliot Rodger and the racist and misogynistic ideals he espoused; and frustration, with a culture that allows lonely and angry men like Rodger to own firearms, giving them the tools to express that loneliness and anger with lethal consequences.
The PUA backlash started with a comment on Rodger’s (now-removed) final YouTube video, a near-seven-minute diatribe where he rants about being denied “affection and sex and love” from “stuck-up blonde sluts.” A YouTuber with the handle Strategic Dating Coach evidently saw the tragedy not as an opportunity to reflect on culturally sanctioned misogyny or our need for more stringent gun control laws, but as a really awesome promotional opportunity for his website:
Screengrab via Jezebel, The Albatross
Strategic Dating Coach’s message, of course, is pretty straightforward: “Had Rodger been well-versed in the art of the pick-up, he no longer would’ve wanted to intern all women and systematically starve them to death in concentration camps, as he describes in his manifesto. Of course, he still would’ve wanted to kill women, because he was fucking crazy. But if he’d had sex, he might not have wanted to kill them, like, as much. Also, check out Strategic Dating Coach! It has more than 200 likes on Facebook, so that’s pretty cool.”
The comment angered so many people on YouTube that the Albatross interviewed the man behind the Strategic Dating Coach website to ask him whathe’d been thinking when he posted the comment. The man, who identifies himself only as Steve, denied using the UCSB shooting as an opportunity for self-promotion; rather, he just wanted to point out that the tragedy could have been prevented had Rodger availed himself of his services, which he describes as “a form of therapy.”
“I’m not saying I could have solved his entire situation but I could have at least helped him with what seems to be the main problem, which is him not being able to get interest from women,” Steve told the Albatross.
(Of course, Rodger’s manifesto goes on at length about his dissatisfaction with traditional PUA sites, which ultimately led him to the even more aggressively misogynistic antiPUA.com. But OK, Steve, go ahead and keep talking about how your arm-touching techniques could’ve saved the lives of seven people.)
Strategic Dating Coach’s attempt to turn the UCSB tragedy into pageviews was followed by an article by the pickup artist Roosh on Return of Kings, his blog for “heterosexual, masculine men.” In the piece, which we won’t deign to link to here, Roosh argues that it wasn’t Rodger’s mental illness that prompted him to kill. Rather, it was the fact that he’d never put his penis in a woman’s vagina:
“Six lives would have been saved if there was a societal mechanism to steer sexually frustrated males like Rodger into learning self-improvement, game, and masculinity, the very values that are taught here and on many other manosphere sites.”
Roosh then goes on to blame the tragedy on a wide range of sources—among them the media, the field of psychiatry, university syllabus warnings, and sexually profligate American women—until arriving at the one person who could have kept Rodger from pulling the trigger: himself.
If Rodger came to me, he would have received actionable and effective advice. He would have been exposed to material detailing how socially corrupt American society has become, and how being a beta male provider—his principal strategy in trying to get laid—is no longer useful in achieving intimacy with women who now see men as entertaining clowns that should provide them with excitement, drama, and tension.
Roosh ends with the ominous conclusion that until men like Rodger are provided with access to unlimited sex—either by engaging in legalized prostitution, learning “game,” or, weirdly, “seek[ing] out a Thai wife”—”it’s inevitable for another massacre to occur.” Hear that, ladies? The next time some creepster starts harassing you on the street or following you home or, as Rodger by all accounts did, just giving off general “I want to use your skin as a lampshade” vibes, better spread those gams and drop those drawers, because Americans’ lives could be at stake.
Just in case it isn’t clear to everyone already: When people decide to take the lives of others, it rarely, if ever, has to do with just one thing.
Elliot Rodger didn’t kill six people just because he didn’t have “game,” or just because he was sexually frustrated, or just because he was mentally ill, or even just because we live in a society where violence against women and male sexual entitlement are as widely accepted. Elliot Rodger killed seven people, including himself, for a lot of different reasons, many of which we know and some of which we never will. And for anyone to argue otherwise is doing an enormous disservice to his family, his victims, and the victims of gender-based violence everywhere.
Screengrab via YouTube
EJ Dickson is a writer and editor who primarily covers sex, dating, and relationships, with a special focus on the intersection of intimacy and technology. She served as the Daily Dot’s IRL editor from January 2014 to July 2015. Her work has since appeared in the New York Times, Rolling Stone, Mic, Bustle, Romper, and Men’s Health.