- Ninja mocked for not knowing how to make a sandwich Wednesday 9:30 PM
- Marvel comics writer discusses misogyny in the industry Wednesday 9:09 PM
- TikTok conspiracy theorists think Juice WRLD is still alive Wednesday 7:03 PM
- Conservatives are protesting YouTube’s new harassment rules Wednesday 5:36 PM
- YouTuber’s ‘creepy’ comment about Taylor Swift’s eggs gets ratioed Wednesday 5:31 PM
- Bloomberg razzed for accidentally making an Alexa Fleshlight Wednesday 5:29 PM
- Who is putting cowboy hats on pigeons? Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Scammer reportedly bribed Facebook employee to keep posts up Wednesday 3:36 PM
- The 1975’s singer criticized for ‘Islamophobic’ rant Wednesday 3:22 PM
- Ready to dish out $52K for Apple’s new Mac Pro? Wednesday 3:03 PM
- N.K. Jemisin and Jamal Campbell discuss their new Green Lantern comic, ‘Far Sector’ Wednesday 3:00 PM
- YouTube says it will be harsher on creators with ‘patterns of harassing behavior’ Wednesday 1:15 PM
- Why one senator stopped a vote on net neutrality Wednesday 12:49 PM
- Man reportedly denied refugee status after officials fail to forward email Wednesday 12:09 PM
- ‘Jojo Rabbit’ star to lead Disney+ ‘Home Alone’ reboot Wednesday 12:08 PM
Does the Internet create fetishes, or just enable them?
What’s the deal with the findom fetish—was it always here? Or is the Internet actually changing human sexuality?
It might be difficult to believe, but your grandmother was 18 once too. No matter how with it and vibrant your grandma still is, though, unless she’s going online for porn all the time, she probably would not recognize this sexual term: “findom.”
Findom, in case you haven’t run across it yourself, is a type of S&M. It’s a fetish that essentially involves the dominant partner fleecing the submissive party for cash. In other words, the “dom”—usually fully clothed, usually a female—maxes out your credit cards. Or makes you do something embarrassing on camera, and then blackmails you.
The fetish is easy to practice over the Internet via webcam and, well… fab.com, I suppose. So it’s proliferated online. As has pornography and sexual behavior in general, of course. Everything from reading smut and looking at dirty pictures to full-fledged sexual relationships between consenting adults has become an online phenomenon. As part of that transition from the physical to the virtual world, sex and human sexuality have become something that’s likely to shock even your 18-year-old grandmother.
But is the Internet actually changing the nature of sex and sexuality? Or simply illuminating what was already there?
There is a real logic to the notion that Internet pornography is changing sex. As ASAPScience has helpfully explained, pornography, esp. online porn, functions very much like a drug. If that seems counterintuitive to you, think of behaviors such as gambling and running, which do the same thing: i.e., release dopamine in your brain. This is exactly the chemical reaction that makes taking a number of illegal drugs fun.
The dopamine doesn’t just make you feel good, it also rewires your brain, making you more likely to repeat that behavior. So you watch more and more porn over time. And the other thing that happens with any addiction is this: you get used to it. So it takes more and more of the stimulus to get you that hit of dopamine you were hoping for. The heroin addict needs to score a little more each time, and the porn enthusiast who starts with some soft-focus missionary stills ends up… well, in a findom relationship over Skype.
On the other hand, one has to wonder how many relationships before the Internet came along were sort of, well, findom relationships? The number one cause of marital strife is marital finances. Conjure up the image of overspending husbands and wives, the uncomfortable arguments we’ve witnessed between couple friends while we wished we could disappear into the couch cushions. Was all that actually just foreplay? Did we just lack the terminology to recognize it?
Still, the mere act of recognizing something and exposing it to outside view is itself a transformative act. We experience this phenomenon everyday when we seek out a friend who will agree with us that the boss is a jerk; or that a mutual acquaintance is crazy; or that our spouses are unreasonable. Our own beliefs and judgment don’t seem real until someone else shares them.
The same phenomenon happens on a cultural level. As the Internet exposes what used to occur only behind closed doors, or even only implicitly in a relationship—perhaps not even consciously recognized by the participants—it makes vague impulses into real choices. That in itself is rewiring our brains.
That’s the key difference here; that pattern, whereby the Internet exposes a latent, heretofore unexpressed reality to the entire culture, is one of its most persistent phenomenons. Consider not just sex, but sexism. Just this week, the CTO of Business Insider was canned because of his repeatedly sexist (and otherwise all kinds of offensive) tweets.
They were things this guy probably would have said to a friend over a drink; if that’s all he’d done, airing them and laughing about it over a beer probably would have validated his opinions, and he’d have kept his job. Instead, he tweeted them; every time egged on, presumably, by that little hit of dopamine. His thoughts became radically more public and he suffered real consequences for sharing them. And because those consequences were public, they do not affect just him. How many people watching the interaction have learned that such behavior is not going to be validated?
The original notion behind the term “meme” is that culture transmits human behavior and characteristics much the way genes do, and far more efficiently. Ideas and behavior in the public square rewire our brains as surely as evolution does. The Internet, then, just as surely is remaking us—perhaps out of the raw material of the old, into something new.
Nicholas White is the founder and editor in chief of the Daily Dot. His work has appeared in Wired, PBS, the Associated Press and elsewhere, and his reporting has been honored for excellence in journalism by the Associated Press.