- Trump kicks chief of staff out of Oval Office for coughing during interview 7 Years Ago
- Netflix announces Samurai version of ‘Game of Thrones’ 7 Years Ago
- The 8-Bit Guy: Why retro tech and restoration isn’t just for ‘old white guys’ Today 7:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 MTV Awards for free Today 7:00 AM
- Why Hillary Clinton is getting blamed for a recent spate of unconnected deaths Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch Nick Jr. online for free Today 5:30 AM
- People are not falling for these ICE ‘propaganda’ photos Sunday 4:23 PM
- CLIF Bar and KIND Snacks are in a bizarre social media war Sunday 2:55 PM
- Caillou is how tall? Sunday 1:32 PM
- No, that video of a Boston Dynamics robot attacking its creators is not real Sunday 12:40 PM
- Alex Jones places $1 million bounty on culprit who planted child porn on his InfoWars server Sunday 12:03 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ star’s new Netflix prank show is receiving backlash Sunday 9:04 AM
- How to watch ‘City on a Hill’ for free Sunday 8:00 AM
- How to watch ‘Euphoria’ for free Sunday 7:00 AM
- Meet the home brewer turning beer into a case for net neutrality Sunday 6:30 AM
Pre-screening videos would cost YouTube $37 billion a year
That’s about as much money as Google, YouTube’s parent company, makes every year.
Every minute, YouTubers upload 72 hours of video. That’s three days worth of content every 60 seconds, 103,680 hours every single day. How much of that actually falls under the site’s embattled copyright guidelines? It would take an army of judges to find out.
That’s the conclusion freelance engineer and Techdirt insider Craig Mansfield came to last Wednesday after a chalkboard’s worth of chicken scratch and long division. Simply put, there is too much video content going onto YouTube every day for a small team of mere mortals to review every video posted.
The annual cost Mansfield predicted the operation would run Google, which owns YouTube? $36,829,468,840. Just a smidgen under $37 billion.
YouTube’s copyright guidelines mandate that all users confirm that they own the copyright or have the permission of the copyright holder before uploading any content onto the site. Not all cases are as mainstream and easily identifiable as the recent Rickroll complaint. Over 100 million videos violated this policy in 2010, the most recent year that copyright statistics were released.
What’s more, those mortals wouldn’t know what constitutes as copyright infringement and what doesn’t. The job requires judges, ones with a vast knowledge of cinematic and television history. And it would cost a fortune.
Mansfield determined that 199,584 judges, making a Silicon Valley industry average of $177,454 per year, would have to work 120 hour work weeks every single week with no paid vacation or holidays in order to keep up with the influx of new YouTube content.
The math on that brings YouTube’s supposed budget for this endeavor to roughly $3 billion, but that’s before paying attention to necessary overhead costs, the time it takes for a judge to assess whether or not the video is an infringement, and the time it takes to switch from one video to another. (Mansfield’s math gets really confusing here, but trust us: that’s a lot of time for a lot of people who all get paid a lot of money.)
The total—$36,829,468,840—is “a massive additional cost to expect from Google to cover a thorough analysis of all video being uploaded” to YouTube, Mansfield stated bluntly.
To put that figure in perspective, Google’s revenue for all of 2011 was just under $38 billion.
Something tells us Mansfield will have a hard time convincing Google CEO Larry Page to sign off this expense.
Photo via BelieveKevin
Chase Hoffberger reported on YouTube, web culture, and crime for the Daily Dot until 2013, when he joined the Austin Chronicle. Until late 2018, he served as that paper’s news editor and reported on criminal justice and politics.