- Fans call out Madonna for edited Eurovision video Tuesday 9:36 PM
- Partnered Twitch streamer temporarily banned for airing troll’s racist message Tuesday 8:45 PM
- Reddit theory says fans are wrong about who won ‘Game of Thrones’ Tuesday 6:52 PM
- Elon Musk hires ‘absolute unit’ sheep meme creator to be Tesla’s social media manager Tuesday 6:12 PM
- Jason Momoa stands by his Khaleesi after the ‘Game of Thrones’ finale Tuesday 4:05 PM
- Airbnb, 23andMe partner for creepy heritage travel recommendations Tuesday 3:26 PM
- Rep. Katie Porter goes viral again for trouncing Ben Carson (updated) Tuesday 3:26 PM
- This deepfake takes Bill Hader’s Schwarzenegger impression to the next level Tuesday 2:58 PM
- Wanda Sykes rails against Trump and offers much-needed perspective in ‘Not Normal’ Tuesday 2:41 PM
- Man arrested after allegedly threatening to shoot YouTube employees Tuesday 2:13 PM
- Some House Dems are backing away from the Save the Internet Act Tuesday 1:40 PM
- Thousands sign petition calling for Danny DeVito to play Wolverine Tuesday 1:02 PM
- Jason Mitchell fired from ‘Desperados’ and ‘The Chi’ after misconduct allegations Tuesday 12:36 PM
- Police raid Black woman’s house after white neighbor complains about loud Malcolm X speeches Tuesday 12:20 PM
- ‘Transfixed’ says it’s a ‘breakthrough’ series, but it still fetishizes trans bodies Tuesday 11:04 AM
Maybe don’t put vintage filters on Notre Dame fire photos
User roasted for making a tragedy about ‘aesthetically pleasing’ VSCO filters.
Amid fire consuming Paris’ Notre Dame cathedral on Monday, the internet has had some less-than-stellar takes surrounding the incident. While the blaze did not reportedly have malicious origins, Twitter user @gaygadott took being tone-deaf online to levels not seen since the Auschwitz concentration camp selfie.
In a post that seems like a personal photography promotion, @gaygadott described the loss of the historical monument as “most aesthetically pleasing visually i’ve ever seen.”
The response to the tweet currently stands at approximately 32,000 likes and 20,000 replies. Apart from being ratioed to hell, the tweet also received the attention of popular Twitter account @ArtDecider. Without much deliberation, the account decreed that the photos @gaygadott had posted were, in fact, “not art.”
After replying to the original tweet with the name of the filters used on the photos, @gaygadott thanked their audience for getting the post to 10,000 likes and clarified that the app used to edit the photos was VSCO.
ps: the app is from vsco
thank y'all for 10k platinum,, 💅pic.twitter.com/99nsDsUsiB
— 𝓌𝑒𝓃 (@gaygadott) April 15, 2019
The general reaction to @gaygadott hasn’t been forgiving. Replies have ranged from simply recognizing the absurdism of the situation to open disdain and disgust for turning a tragedy into #content.
Aside from YouTube's algorithm thinking the Notre Dame fire was 9/11 and far-right grifters claiming it was an inside job, a Brazilian DC stan is currently being ratio'd out of existence for saying the fire was "aesthetically pleasing" pic.twitter.com/J3WvRJ1hjZ
— Ryan Broderick (@broderick) April 15, 2019
vsco bitches have no morals i swear https://t.co/s9wbuNfRah
— kate (@margielamartin) April 15, 2019
glad the destruction of centuries worth of history is
~a e s t h e t i c~
for you https://t.co/tt9nOVhzAW
— Chance Harbour (@ChanceHarbour) April 15, 2019
After the backlash, @gaygadott tried to save some face by saying that they were not the original creator of the images and that the images were posted as “just a joke.”
for the people who is asking for the filter on edits: i don't know, i stole these edits from someone who deleted the tweet quickly and i will obviously not share their @ bc them regreted this anyway
it was just a joke mocking people who do this 😭
— 𝓌𝑒𝓃 (@gaygadott) April 15, 2019
Neither VSCO nor @gaygadott immediately responded to the Daily Dot’s request for comment.
Ignacio Martinez is a journalism student at the University of Texas at Austin and an intern at the Daily Dot. His work has appeared in the Texas Observer and on the airwaves at KVRX 91.7 FM.