- The horror game banned for mocking China’s president probably isn’t coming back 3 Months Ago
- Cheap vibrators, condoms, and lube: The most satisfying Amazon Prime Day deals 3 Months Ago
- George R.R. Martin says fan backlash won’t affect his ‘Game of Thrones’ ending 3 Months Ago
- The very finest Area 51 memes 3 Months Ago
- Tweet map ranks states where people are boycotting Amazon Prime Day Today 1:54 PM
- Lil Nas X says he will perform at Area 51 for free Today 12:56 PM
- The best Prime Day deals for gamers Today 12:53 PM
- How Republicans are dancing around Trump’s racist tweets Today 12:42 PM
- Not even anti-immigrant groups are defending Trump’s ‘go back’ tweets Today 12:37 PM
- Netflix’s latest chase thriller ‘Point Blank’ lacks electricity Today 12:27 PM
- Jay Inslee floats Megan Rapinoe as his secretary of state pick Today 11:33 AM
- The cast list for the ‘Kingsman’ prequel movie looks totally nuts Today 11:17 AM
- The best Prime Day deals to heat up your kitchen Today 11:16 AM
- YouTuber Emily Hartridge killed in electric scooter crash Today 10:50 AM
- Is Lashana Lynch really playing 007 in the new Bond movie? Today 10:33 AM
Maybe don’t put vintage filters on Notre Dame fire photos
User roasted for making a tragedy about ‘aesthetically pleasing’ VSCO filters.
Amid fire consuming Paris’ Notre Dame cathedral on Monday, the internet has had some less-than-stellar takes surrounding the incident. While the blaze did not reportedly have malicious origins, Twitter user @gaygadott took being tone-deaf online to levels not seen since the Auschwitz concentration camp selfie.
In a post that seems like a personal photography promotion, @gaygadott described the loss of the historical monument as “most aesthetically pleasing visually i’ve ever seen.”
The response to the tweet currently stands at approximately 32,000 likes and 20,000 replies. Apart from being ratioed to hell, the tweet also received the attention of popular Twitter account @ArtDecider. Without much deliberation, the account decreed that the photos @gaygadott had posted were, in fact, “not art.”
After replying to the original tweet with the name of the filters used on the photos, @gaygadott thanked their audience for getting the post to 10,000 likes and clarified that the app used to edit the photos was VSCO.
The general reaction to @gaygadott hasn’t been forgiving. Replies have ranged from simply recognizing the absurdism of the situation to open disdain and disgust for turning a tragedy into #content.
Aside from YouTube's algorithm thinking the Notre Dame fire was 9/11 and far-right grifters claiming it was an inside job, a Brazilian DC stan is currently being ratio'd out of existence for saying the fire was "aesthetically pleasing" pic.twitter.com/J3WvRJ1hjZ— Ryan Broderick (@broderick) April 15, 2019
vsco bitches have no morals i swear https://t.co/s9wbuNfRah— kate (@margielamartin) April 15, 2019
glad the destruction of centuries worth of history is— Chance Harbour (@ChanceHarbour) April 15, 2019
~a e s t h e t i c~
for you https://t.co/tt9nOVhzAW
After the backlash, @gaygadott tried to save some face by saying that they were not the original creator of the images and that the images were posted as “just a joke.”
Neither VSCO nor @gaygadott immediately responded to the Daily Dot’s request for comment.
Ignacio Martinez is a journalism student at the University of Texas at Austin and an intern at the Daily Dot. His work has appeared in the Texas Observer and on the airwaves at KVRX 91.7 FM.