- Cara Delevingne calls out Justin Bieber for ‘ranking’ wife Hailey’s friends Friday 9:07 PM
- Fans defend Jenna Marbles after some people claimed she mistreated her dogs in a recent video Friday 8:37 PM
- ‘Friends’ gets reunion special on HBO Max, fans go wild Friday 7:37 PM
- Why you should drop everything and start reading ‘Lore Olympus’ Friday 6:27 PM
- ‘Boogaloo’ memes are trying to organize a second civil war—and they’re spreading fast Friday 3:48 PM
- People are disturbed by these McDonald’s-scented candles Friday 3:47 PM
- Season 2 of ‘The Witcher’ is in production Friday 3:16 PM
- Here are some cringey billboards Bloomberg ran in Arizona Friday 2:51 PM
- PewDiePie returns to YouTube after 37-day hiatus Friday 2:01 PM
- Why was a Republican Party Facebook page co-managed by someone in Turkmenistan? Friday 1:26 PM
- The shorthand guide to ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ Friday 1:07 PM
- Congress urges Tinder to screen for sex offenders Friday 1:03 PM
- Video shows 9-year-old threatening suicide after being bullied Friday 12:01 PM
- Ex-Goldman Sachs CEO says he might vote Trump because Sanders is too mean to him Friday 11:40 AM
- Twitch streamer says she was banned for body painting Friday 11:39 AM
Though a federal judge made it clear that a macaque named Naruto doesn’t have the right to sue for a selfie he took six years ago, the monkey—or at least its breed—is still getting something out of the lawsuit.
As the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) announced on Tuesday, it reached a settlement with photographer David Slater to donate 25 percent of any future revenue he makes from the monkey selfie to charities that “protect the habitat of Naruto and other crested macaques in Indonesia.”
“PETA and David Slater agree that this case raises important, cutting-edge issues about expanding legal rights for nonhuman animals, a goal that they both support, and they will continue their respective work to achieve this goal,” the two sides said in a joint statement.
Naruto apparently picked up Slater’s unattended camera in the Indonesian jungle in 2011 and then took a picture of himself. After Slater published the photo in a book, PETA sued on behalf of the monkey and said Slater had infringed on Naruto’s copyright.
While Slater’s attorney said, “Naruto can’t benefit financially from his work. He is a monkey,” PETA argued that the Copyright Act limit didn’t only apply to humans. A federal district judge agreed with Slater, and PETA appealed the decision.
But the two reached a settlement agreement before the appeals court could rule.
As PETA claimed, the case was a way to initiate a discussion about the need to “extend fundamental rights to animals for their own sake—not in relation to the ways in which they can be exploited by humans.”
Now that this case has been settled, though, the world can focus on what’s sure to be the next copyright fight: What rights do robots have if they make a sex video?
Josh Katzowitz is a staff writer at the Daily Dot specializing in YouTube and boxing. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. A longtime sports writer, he's covered the NFL for CBSSports.com and boxing for Forbes. His work has been noted twice in the Best American Sports Writing book series.