- The Meghan McCain ‘my father’ meme exemplifies every entitled white girl Thursday 8:11 PM
- Irony of Georgia’s sperm-reporting bill flies by anti-abortion advocates Thursday 7:11 PM
- Sex scandals are consuming the K-pop industry Thursday 5:44 PM
- Trump supporters are abandoning Fox News over network’s latest hire Thursday 5:20 PM
- QAnon is attacking a random woman in a disturbing and dangerous way Thursday 4:59 PM
- Google celebrates Bach with AI-powered, music-making doodle Thursday 4:53 PM
- RIP: The best free trial in all of streaming entertainment Thursday 2:19 PM
- Which ‘Florida Man’ are you? Thursday 1:06 PM
- Hundreds of millions of Facebook passwords were accessible to employees Thursday 12:55 PM
- ‘Bitch I’m Bella Thorne’ morphs into TikTok dyslexia meme Thursday 12:17 PM
- Marvel is auctioning props and costumes from Netflix’s ‘Defenders’ franchise Thursday 12:12 PM
- Net neutrality advocates plan online watch party for the ‘Save the Internet’ Act Thursday 12:01 PM
- Tim Cook turns his iPad meme into an AirPod meme Thursday 11:46 AM
- Auschwitz Memorial asks visitors to stop taking playful photos at Holocaust site Thursday 11:33 AM
- The best Korean beauty products for $15 or less Thursday 10:50 AM
High-profile users abandon Instagram over new terms of service
National Geographic, Wired writer Mat Honan, and singer Pink are just three of the well-known Instagram users who are leaving the photo-sharing community because of its controversial new terms of service.
National Geographic, known for its award-winning photography, had 638,000 followers and “must be the biggest account to back out of Instagram over [the new ToS] so far,” tweeted Lexi Mainland, New York Times social media editor.
On Monday, Instagram altered its ToS to allow a business to pay the company “to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.”
The change essentially meant that anything a user did on Instagram from mid-January onward could be used in advertising—with no financial benefit to the user. The company also claimed it would not have to notify users when their data was used. The only way to opt out of the terms is delete your account and photos.
“From the start, Instagram was created to become a business. Advertising is one of many ways that Instagram can become a self-sustaining business, but not the only one. Our intention in updating the terms was to communicate that we’d like to experiment with innovative advertising that feels appropriate on Instagram. Instead it was interpreted by many that we were going to sell your photos to others without any compensation. This is not true and it is our mistake that this language is confusing. To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos. We are working on updated language in the terms to make sure this is clear.”
“I believe Instagram should be able to make money. Facebook telegraphed that something like this was coming just last week, and my reaction at the time was ‘good,'” Honan wrote. “Yet I also believe it’s wrong to take people’s photos – out.”
Pink, on the other hand, was far more blunt with her feelings about application known for its filters.
“I WILL BE QUITTING INSTAGRAM TODAY. WHAT A BUMMER,” said the singer’s message, which was retweeted 4,100 times. “YOU SHOULD ALL READ THEIR NEW RULES.”
Photo by MJ/TR (´･ω･)/Flickr
Fernando Alfonso III served as an early Reddit and 4chan reporter and the Daily Dot’s first art director until 2016. He’s gone on to report at Lexington’s Herald-Leader and at the Houston Chronicle.