- QAnon-touting congressman sneaks ‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’ into tweets Wednesday 7:12 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez met a famous drag queen–and the right melted down Wednesday 6:09 PM
- Woman says Lyft driver tried to kidnap her Wednesday 5:18 PM
- Debunking the right-wing conspiracy theories from today’s impeachment hearing Wednesday 4:29 PM
- Maroon 5 approves of the latest TikTok trend Wednesday 3:54 PM
- ‘One month left in the decade’ meme wants to know what you’ve accomplished Wednesday 3:53 PM
- Facebook Pay is the latest way to send your friends money Wednesday 3:31 PM
- Diving into ‘The Mandalorian’s first big shocker Wednesday 3:17 PM
- Disney+ will allow password sharing—to an extent Wednesday 1:12 PM
- Black server says manager refused to discipline coworkers who sent racist receipt Wednesday 12:47 PM
- Who is Jonah Hauer-King, Disney’s new Prince Eric? Wednesday 12:47 PM
- Cut Katherine Langford ‘Avengers: Endgame’ scene lands on Disney+ Wednesday 12:22 PM
- Planned Parenthood app to show abortion-seeking users their nearest options Wednesday 12:21 PM
- ‘The Imagineering Story’ offers touching insight into Walt Disney’s vision Wednesday 11:57 AM
- YouTube mom who was charged with child abuse dead at 48 Wednesday 11:39 AM
The lawsuit, first filed in 2013, alleges that the unauthorized use of Lohan’s likeness appeared in Grand Theft Auto V. The character in question, Lacey Jonas, is a famous actress who starred in a number of high school movies, and she needs help in escaping the flashing cameras of the paparazzi. Jonas is largely portrayed as an idiot and is mocked by the media.
Lohan claims in her lawsuit that the character violates her rights to her likeness.
A separate lawsuit filed in 2014 claimed that Take-Two also used products from Lohan’s clothing line in Grand Theft Auto V.
In response, Take-Two countered by arguing that Lohan filed the lawsuit for the publicity, and pointed to suits against E*Trade for a TV commercial and Pitbull’s lyrics, and noted that she missed the statute of limitations with her lawsuit.
New York Supreme Court judge Joan Kennedy ruled that the evidence from Take-Two isn’t sufficient for her to throw out the case.
“Defendants have not been able to prove, at this juncture of the litigation, that the republication exemption to the one year statute of limitations is not applicable to this case because the intended audiences were the same as those of the original publication and the images consistently remained the same.”
Michelle Jaworski is a staff writer and the resident Game of Thrones expert at the Daily Dot. She covers entertainment, geek culture, and pop culture and has brought her knowledge to conventions like Con of Thrones. She is based in New Jersey.