- Trump admin celebrates Michelle Obama’s birthday by proposing rollback of her signature initiative Today 4:01 PM
- TSA apologizes after agent grabs indigenous woman’s braids, says ‘giddyup’ Today 3:28 PM
- Blue Bell ice cream licker pleads guilty Today 2:54 PM
- 7 fortune-telling sites for when you’re bored Today 2:21 PM
- Governor bans sex puns on free condom wrappers Today 2:16 PM
- Is Justin Bieber’s ‘Yummy’ video secretly about Pizzagate? Today 1:01 PM
- Woah Vicky rips out her hair in botched cultural appropriation attempt Today 12:30 PM
- Here’s an exclusive look at ‘Weathering With You’ Today 11:57 AM
- TikTok dudes are dipping their balls in soy sauce for ‘science’ Today 11:49 AM
- Pete Buttigieg’s denial of fixing bread prices becomes its own meme Today 11:10 AM
- Houston Astros get torched with buzzer memes after new revelation Today 10:41 AM
- Teens are eating cereal out of each other’s mouths for clout Today 10:34 AM
- Did Martha McSally plan her ‘liberal hack’ viral moment? Today 10:32 AM
- Trump adds Jeffrey Epstein’s old attorney to impeachment team Today 10:03 AM
- YouTube star Cameron Dallas gets scathing reviews for his Broadway debut Today 9:58 AM
The lawsuit, first filed in 2013, alleges that the unauthorized use of Lohan’s likeness appeared in Grand Theft Auto V. The character in question, Lacey Jonas, is a famous actress who starred in a number of high school movies, and she needs help in escaping the flashing cameras of the paparazzi. Jonas is largely portrayed as an idiot and is mocked by the media.
Lohan claims in her lawsuit that the character violates her rights to her likeness.
A separate lawsuit filed in 2014 claimed that Take-Two also used products from Lohan’s clothing line in Grand Theft Auto V.
In response, Take-Two countered by arguing that Lohan filed the lawsuit for the publicity, and pointed to suits against E*Trade for a TV commercial and Pitbull’s lyrics, and noted that she missed the statute of limitations with her lawsuit.
New York Supreme Court judge Joan Kennedy ruled that the evidence from Take-Two isn’t sufficient for her to throw out the case.
“Defendants have not been able to prove, at this juncture of the litigation, that the republication exemption to the one year statute of limitations is not applicable to this case because the intended audiences were the same as those of the original publication and the images consistently remained the same.”
Michelle Jaworski is a staff writer and the resident Game of Thrones expert at the Daily Dot. She covers entertainment, geek culture, and pop culture and has brought her knowledge to conventions like Con of Thrones. She is based in New Jersey.