At the annual World Science Fiction Convention, Hugo statuettes went to authors including N.K. Jemisin and Nnedi Okorafor, and popular sci-fi media like The Martian and Jessica Jones. Yet in some categories, voters decided to select “No Award” over any of the shortlisted nominees, reflecting ongoing conflicts in the sci-fi/fantasy community.
Here’s a full list of the winners:
- Novel: The Fifth Season by N.K. Jemisin
- Novella (17,500 – 40,000 words): Binti by Nnedi Okorafor
- Novelette (7,500 – 17,500 words): “Folding Beijing” by Hao Jingfang, translated by Ken Liu
- Short story: “Cat Pictures Please” by Naomi Kritzer
- Related work: No Award
- Graphic story: The Sandman: Overture written by Neil Gaiman, art by J.H. Williams III
- Dramatic presentation, longform: The Martian
- Dramatic presentation, shortform: “Smile,” Jessica Jones
- Editor, shortform: Ellen Datlow
- Editor, longform: Sheila E. Gilbert
- Professional artist: Abigail Larson
- Semiprozine: Uncanny Magazine
- Fanzine: File 770
- Fancast: No Award
- Fan writer: Mark Glyer (File 770)
- Fan artist: Steve Stiles
It was a sad day for fans of Chuck Tingle, the king of bizarre Amazon ebook erotica. His gay dinosaur porno Space Raptor Butt Invasion lost out to an acclaimed work by Naomi Kritzer in the short story category. Tingle sent game developer and anti-harassment activist Zoe Quinn to represent him at the Hugo ceremony.
While the Hugos are not especially influential in the TV, film, or comics industries, they hold an important place in sci-fi/fantasy publishing and fandom. N.K. Jemisin, who won the highly coveted award for best novel, is a rising star in the SF/F community, and was previously nominated for several other Hugo and Nebula awards. Her novel The Fifth Season is the first in a series set on a planet that undergoes drastic climate change every few hundred years.
In the shorter fiction categories, Nnedi Okorafor’s “Binti” was one of the most talked-about novellas of the year, Hao Jingfang’s “Folding Beijing” is a rare example of a translated work receiving widespread acclaim among English-speaking audiences, and Naomi Kritzer’s “Cat Pictures Please,” won this year’s Locus award and was nominated for a Nebula. This core group of celebrated authors can be seen as a repudiation of the Sad Puppies’ campaign to disrupt the Hugos.
For the past few years, the Sad Puppies (and their offshoot campaign, the Rabid Puppies) attempted to game the Hugo system by bloc-voting for a pre-selected slate of nominees. Many of those nominees were chosen as a response to the belief that SF/F publishing had become too “politically correct” and progressive, drawing comparisons to Gamergate—hence why one of this year’s nominees was a self-published book titled SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police.
While the Sad and Rabid Puppies found it relatively easy to get their nominees onto the Hugo shortlists, voters have repeatedly rejected those nominees. This led to five “No Awards” in 2015 and two this year, representing an impasse between the Puppies and their opponents: Puppy nominees may not actually win anything, but neither do the writers or editors who would otherwise have been nominated in those categories.
So, once again, many fans are wondering if the Hugo voting process is due for a drastic overhaul, to avoid another gridlocked voting process in 2017.