- ‘Bachelor’ contestant apologizes for ‘White Lives Matter’ photo shoot Today 12:13 AM
- ‘Sonic The Hedgehog’ sets box office record for video game movies Sunday 8:15 PM
- Truck driver allegedly watching porn kills teen driver in a car crash Sunday 6:44 PM
- Is the Buttigieg campaign behind this pro-Pete Nigerian Twitter account? Sunday 4:58 PM
- Mask that has your face printed on it allows you to unlock your phone during viral epidemics Sunday 3:52 PM
- Justin Bieber slid into the DMs of someone who hated his new album Sunday 1:05 PM
- HQ Trivia host and co-founder in Twitter feud amid shutdown Sunday 12:10 PM
- YouTuber shamed for fake call with Caroline Flack after her death Sunday 10:59 AM
- This MAGA-loving Keanu Reeves imposter isn’t fooling anyone Sunday 10:16 AM
- How to watch ‘Outlander’ season 5 online Sunday 8:00 AM
- Kobe Bryant’s complicated online legacy isn’t buried with him Sunday 6:00 AM
- TikTok teen’s reaction to discovering boyfriend’s cheating goes viral Saturday 4:46 PM
- This may be the creepiest Amazon review you’ll ever read Saturday 3:58 PM
- Bill Maher booed on own show over defense of Bloomberg Saturday 3:37 PM
- The Sun allegedly deletes negative Caroline Flack story after her death Saturday 2:48 PM
Texas law would protect bloggers from defamation suits
A proposed law would let bloggers correct inaccurate statements instead of going to court over them.
Mudslinging bloggers in Texas might get a little more protection from folks who want to sue them for their words.
Texas state representative Todd Hunter (R-Corpus Christi) has introduced a bill that would give website owners accused of defamation a grace period to correct their content before they can be found guilty.
House Bill 1759, which is currently before the committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence, would provide a buffer for online writers. Under it, anyone facing defamation charges could ask for evidence that they’re incorrect, and would have 90 days to correct or retract what they’ve published if they think it wouldn’t hold up in court.
“This out of court dispute resolution provides a stark contrast to defamation lawsuits, which, once filed, encourage publishers and subjects to stick to their guns and fight it out in a winner-take-all battle that is unlikely to benefit any party,” notes Harvard’s Digital Media Law Project.
“At that point, publishers typically adamantly support their legal right to publish what they have published in order to avoid liability, rather than considering extra-legal considerations like fairness and accuracy. “
More than half the states in the U.S. have existing, similar laws for print, radio, and television, but most of those laws, unlike Hunter’s, don’t explicitly extend to the Internet. Texas, however, is clearly forward-thinking when it comes to online free speech. It already has one on the books against the practice of SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), the practice of accusing others of defamation with outrageous lawsuits in order to censor content.
Of course, the state legislature could be accused of getting a little too excited about the Internet. Representative Jeff Leach (R-Plano) recently introduced a law that would allow law enforcement to serve legal papers over Facebook.
Screengrab via Todd Hunter/YouTube
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.