- Biden wants to challenge Trump to a push-up contest 6 Years Ago
- Trump continues to tweet as House gears up to condemn his racist tweets 6 Years Ago
- Your therapist probably wouldn’t approve of this meme 6 Years Ago
- Batman Talisman finally lets the villains rule Gotham City Today 8:22 AM
- Controversial #ICEBae divides social media Today 8:22 AM
- Why Veronica Mars doesn’t drop any F-bombs in Hulu’s adult-rated revival Today 7:11 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Taco Chronicles’ will make your heart soar and mouth water Today 7:00 AM
- The view of Prime Day from Amazon’s warehouse strike Today 6:30 AM
- Conspiracy theorists think underground nukes are to blame for California’s earthquakes Today 6:30 AM
- How to follow along with San Diego Comic Con online Today 6:00 AM
- How to live stream the International Champions Cup Today 5:00 AM
- A police union is urging its officers to post ‘The Punisher’ logo Monday 7:33 PM
- Redditors call for a Nestlé boycott through memes Monday 6:16 PM
- How a 10-second Disney jingle became a meme in Thailand Monday 4:48 PM
- Instagram users share photos showing gruesome killing of 17-year-old Bianca Devins Monday 4:33 PM
The Marketplace Fairness Act is likely to pass in its Senate vote later this week.
The great political battle between real-world and online retailers is nearing its end.
And it’s not looking good for the Internet’s stores.
The Marketplace Fairness Act was designed to counter something eBay and Amazon users have taken advantage of for a long time: Online retailers currently only charge sales tax if they have a physical presence in their customers’ state. With the MFA in place, some reports estimate it could raise up to $11 billion in extra taxes.
The act passed a procedural Senate vote Monday evening with an impressive 74-20 vote. It now enters an amendment debate phase, and should see a final Senate vote this week.
That vote would be the bill’s final hurdle. The White House has already said it would sign such a bill into law, citing local governments’ need for that tax money. “Because these out-of-state companies are able to cut corners and play by a different set of rules,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday, “the cities and states lose out on funding for K-12 education, police and fire protection, access to affordable health care, and funding for roads and bridges.”
Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a cosponsor of the bill, said it would end the unfair practice of “showrooming.”
“Why would somebody try the shoes on and not buy them? Go to the Internet,” Durbin said on the Senate floor. “In many instances, it’s because many Internet retailers do not collect sales tax.”
It’s worth noting the act would only apply to the big players, as it exempts businesses that do less than a million dollars in annual out-of-state sales. That puts online marketplace giant eBay in an even tighter bind, and it’s repeatedly emailed its members, urging them to contact their Senators to vote down the bill.
Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who is the only member of the Senate to sign the Declaration of Internet Freedom and hails from one of the few states that has no sales tax, has strongly denounced the bill.
“The MFA fully discriminates against Internet companies,” he posted in a statement on his website. “The MFA relies on Internet sellers to determine the address of where consumers are located in order to generate a proximation of where a good or service sold by an online retailer will be consumed. There is no similar requirement imposed upon brick-and-mortar businesses even though consumers often travel across state lines in order to purchase goods.”
Photo via Tcc8/Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.