- Lyft received a whopping 7 sexual assault lawsuits in a day Wednesday 10:00 PM
- High school reopens investigation into Nazi salute video after other racist videos emerge Wednesday 7:14 PM
- Facebook content moderators continue to suffer from brutal working conditions Wednesday 5:58 PM
- #RIPReese: Man bullied for relationship with trans woman dies by suicide Wednesday 4:46 PM
- Redaction error reveals ICE is paying Palantir $49 million Wednesday 4:25 PM
- People are using social media to raise awareness about the Amazon fires Wednesday 4:24 PM
- How to watch ‘Detective Pikachu’ right now Wednesday 3:56 PM
- Walmart is suing Tesla over fires at stores with solar panels Wednesday 3:44 PM
- Jeremy Renner asks nicely for Sony to let Spider-Man back in the MCU Wednesday 2:51 PM
- The best and safest torrenting sites you should be using in 2019 Wednesday 2:47 PM
- ‘Beyoncé’s Assistant for a Day’ creator is releasing more games on storytelling app Yarn Wednesday 1:54 PM
- Why does everyone keep falling for that Instagram and Facebook hoax? Wednesday 1:46 PM
- A bunch of celebrities fell for that viral Instagram hoax Wednesday 1:17 PM
- Former Die Antwoord crew member says video shows ‘homophobic attack’ Wednesday 1:13 PM
- How to stream all the MLS Rivalry Week matches Wednesday 1:13 PM
Federal judge says FAA’s ban on drones doesn’t fly
It turns out the rules are not legally binding.
Since 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration has been doing a lot to keep commercial drones from flying in U.S. airspace. Everything, it turns out, besides actually making them illegal.
That’s the determination of a federal judge who, this week, ruled that commercial drones are legal to fly because of an FAA oversight in drafting a ban on unmanned aviation vehicles. It turns out the rules they made are not legally binding.
The judge threw out the FAA’s case against Raphael Pirker, the first and only person that has ever been taken to court by the FAA for violating the commercial drone ban. Pirker, 29, used an unmanned drone to gather aerial footage for a commercial for the University of Virginia. Because he was paid for his work, the FAA attempted to fine Pirker $10,000.
The FAA based it’s entire case against Pirker on a 2007 policy notice prohibiting businesses from using unmanned aircraft. But according to Patrick Geraghty, a judge with the National Transportation Safety Board, the FAA never undertook the required public notice procedure necessary to turn this policy into an enforceable regulation.
Since issuing the policy notice seven years ago, the FAA has repeatedly said that their is “no gray area” in regards to its ban on commercial drones. However, Geraghty thought otherwise, stating in his ruling:
“[The FAA] has not issued an enforceable Federal Acquisition Regulation regulatory rule governing model aircraft operation; has historically exempted model aircraft from the statutory FAR definitions of ‘aircraft’ by relegating model aircraft operations to voluntary compliance with the guidance expressed in [the 2007 policy notice], Respondent’s model aircraft operation was not subject to FAR regulation and enforcement.”
For now, this means that companies like Dominos, who’ve flirted with delivery drones in foreign countries, could bring those same services to the U.S. Though the FAA may work quickly to establish an emergency rule codifying the ban once again.
However, this ban may only be in effect for a few more years. The FAA is expected to establish detailed drone regulations as early as 2015. These new regulations have been pushed for by companies like Amazon, which announced several months ago that it was in the process of creating a fleet of delivery drones.
Tim Sampson is a reporter who focused on the technology, business, and politics beats. He's also an established comedy writer, with work on Comedy Central and in The Onion and ClickHole.