- Polar Peak in Fortnite is cracking, and players think a dragon may be beneath the ice 6 Years Ago
- ‘Rise of Skywalker’ first look reveals mysterious new characters 6 Years Ago
- Meet the anti-choice, pro-NRA Trump supporter challenging Rep. Justin Amash 6 Years Ago
- Moby attempts to prove he dated Natalie Portman with a shirtless photo 6 Years Ago
- After feuding with James Charles, Tati Westbrook angers the YouTube community Today 11:06 AM
- Does Keri Russell’s ‘Rise of Skywalker’ character have an offensive name in Spanish? Today 10:59 AM
- It’s not clear if Ralph Northam is in racist yearbook photo, investigators say Today 10:48 AM
- The atonement of an alt-right troll Today 9:25 AM
- #StopTheBans protests draw thousands across the country in support of abortion rights Today 9:24 AM
- North Korea is using Trump’s low IQ attack on Joe Biden Today 9:14 AM
- How to watch ‘Kidding’ for free Today 8:00 AM
- What’s the deal with Bran Stark at the end of ‘Game of Thrones’? Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch TruTV online for free Today 6:00 AM
- Fans call out Madonna for edited Eurovision video Tuesday 9:36 PM
- Partnered Twitch streamer temporarily banned for airing troll’s racist message Tuesday 8:45 PM
A U.S. District Court judge refused to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging that Google violated wiretapping laws.
A class action lawsuit filed against the tech giant alleges that Google’s terms of service did not explicitly explain to users that their emails would be intercepted and scanned by the company. As such, the plaintiffs claim the company violated federal and state wiretapping laws.
Google filed a motion to dismiss the suit in U.S. District Court of Northern California, arguing that users gave their implicit consent to have their emails scanned.
However, judge Lucy Koh denied Google’s request, explaining that “a reasonable Gmail user who read the Privacy Policies would not have necessarily understood that her emails were being intercepted to create user profiles or to provide targeted advertisements.”
Google defended its scanning practices by pointing out that they allow not only for advertising but for spam filtering and “security.”
The company’s argument for scanning emails echoes that of the National Security Agency after former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden disclosed secret documents outlining the U.S. government’s massive Internet spying operation. Similarly to Google, the NSA defended its actions as a necessary violation of privacy for the sake of security.
In the case of Google, the advocacy group Consumer Watchdog called this argument “tortured logic.”
Photo by brionv/Flickr
Joe Kloc is a former Daily Dot contributor who covered technology and policy. He's contributed to Newsweek and Mother Jones, discussed his reporting on air with WNYC, and written Weekly Reviews for Harper's Magazine.