- Reddit Relationships: Man laughs at girlfriend for using Microsoft PowerPoint during sex Thursday 8:59 PM
- The 15 Brad Pitt movies you need to see now, ranked Thursday 8:26 PM
- Facebook could face legal action over the Area 51 event Thursday 6:50 PM
- How to stream Texans vs. Chargers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 6:40 PM
- Tekashi 69 alleges Cardi B was a Bloods gang member Thursday 5:55 PM
- Right-wing sites falsely claimed group of Somalis attacked man in viral video Thursday 5:00 PM
- Big creators risk losing checkmarks amid YouTube verification purge Thursday 4:56 PM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Lions in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:52 PM
- How to stream Steelers vs. 49ers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:10 PM
- How to stream Bills vs. Bengals in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:03 PM
- Colt halts production of AR-15s for civilians Thursday 3:45 PM
- If you love long-winded, hashtag-heavy Instagram captions, these apps can help Thursday 2:54 PM
- Teen girls on TikTok have convinced the internet that they eat their tampons Thursday 2:33 PM
- Twitch streamer faces criticism for trying to defend racist jokes Thursday 2:03 PM
- How to stream Raiders vs. Vikings in Week 3 Thursday 12:55 PM
After more than three and a half years, the extradition trial for notorious Internet entrepreneur, alleged commercial copyright infringer, and “Bond villain” Kim Dotcom finally started Monday.
In case you’re confused by his outsized personality, his similarly-named sites, or his insanely convoluted legal proceedings, we’ve put together an explainer of who Kim Dotcom is and what’s at stake.
Who is Kim Dotcom?
This question alone could easily be its own explainer. In short, he’s a 41-year-old German hacker and Internet entrepreneur who moved to New Zealand and founded two free cloud-storage companies in the past few years. First it was Megaupload, which lasted from 2005 to 2012. Then, after the U.S. and New Zealand governments shut Megaupload down, he created its sequel, simply called Mega. The second site is similar, though it offers users the added benefit of encrypting their files.
As for Dotcom himself, he’s huge, in pretty much every sense of the world. Physically, he’s reportedly 6-foot-7 and some 350 pounds (or at least approaching that; accounts vary). His personality is enormous, as are his I-just-won-the-lottery tastes. (The best insight into his character comes from this 2012 Wired profile.) And while he’s hardly the first person to make money from the Internet, how many Web entrepreneurs do you know of, even the really rich ones, who gleefully show off their mansions, huge estates, $100,000 custom Swedish beds, and fancy cars?
Are his sites any good?
Sure. Megaupload did, and Mega does, offer a good bit of online storage for free. (Disclosure: It’s not my go-to storage site, but I use the free Mega occasionally.) You can find plenty of former Megaupload users who are salty about its closure, though. After it went down, a lot of users never saw their files again. A lot of user content ended up stored with a Dutch site called Leaseweb, which said that it wiped its servers for other uses after going more than a year without being paid or hearing anything about that data. Dotcom lamented it as “the largest data massacre in the history of the Internet.”
Why is he named Kim Dotcom?
His paternal line doesn’t trace back to a professional website, if that’s what you were thinking. Like a lot of hacker types, he’s gone by a few personas over the years. He was born Kim Schmitz and for years went by “Kimble.” He legally changed his last name to Dotcom in 2005.
How long has he been like… this?
At least as early as 2001. A Guardian story from that year spoke of Dotcom—back then, he was still Schmitz—as a reformed hacker who was hopelessly optimistic about his venture at the time, an online retail store called LetsBuy.It. He was living the big life, even then: He had a jet, a helicopter, a yacht.
A year later, LetsBuy.It’s stock was almost worthless, and Dotcom was convicted of insider trading.
What’s he accused of now?
Dotcom’s charges—and it’s really worth noting here that what he’s fighting now is whether he should be extradited to the U.S., not whether he’s guilty—are often reduced to something like “facilitating copyright infringement.” And to be fair, Megaupload made sharing pirated files extremely easy: Pretty much anybody could simply upload a movie file to the site and share the link with whomever they wanted.
But his actual charges are a little more complicated. The U.S. has accused Dotcom, as well as three others who were deeply involved with Megaupload, of operating what they call the “‘Mega Conspiracy.” And what’s that? It’s “a worldwide criminal organization whose members engaged in criminal copyright infringement and money laundering on a massive scale with estimated harm to copyright holders well in excess of $500,000,000 and reported income in excess of $175,000,000,” according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
Wait, hold up. Megaupload cost copyright owners $500 million?
Yeah, that number’s questionable. Our deep dive about Hollywood-funded piracy studies found that companies that allege mass copyright infringement have some pretty creative ways of coming up with the highest possible amount of money they’ve lost to piracy. Remember how the record industry used to sue people for insane amounts of money for using programs like Kazaa? U.S. copyright law allows for damages of up to $150,000 per instance of deliberate infringement. Multiply that by whatever, and you get $500 million.
How did Megaupload make its money?
The U.S says that premium accounts—which you could rent for a few dollars a day or buy a lifetime membership for $260—brought in $150 million and that online ads brought in an additional $25 million. So, over the course of its existence, the guys at Mega allegedly made around $175 million.
That sounds pretty standard for a big Web company. What’s the “conspiracy?”
Every major site that’s centered around user-submitted content has to deal with users submitting copyrighted material. It’s simply the reality of the Internet. Per the U.S.’s Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), sites won’t be charged for that user content—they’ll be given “safe harbor”—if they follow certain procedures for dealing with it.
But the U.S. claims Megaupload not only didn’t do its fair share to earn safe harbor, it was was exceptionally lax. It says Dotcom and crew winked at users who helped each other pirate content with its “uploader rewards” program, which paid and gave extra benefits to users who uploaded the most popular content, which, of course, was often whatever hot movie or album or program that people would otherwise pay for.
So he’s actually charged with… ?
- Conspiracy to commit racketeering, along with six others, for creating the entire “Mega Conspiracy” and funneling Megaupload’s profits through a number of companies.
- Conspiracy to commit copyright infringement—seven years of it, during which everybody involved allegedly went to great, and illegal, lengths to hide the operation’s size.
- Money laundering, because some of Megaupload’s servers were in Virginia. It’s compounded by the accusation that the company wired money in excess of $10,000 to different holding companies around the globe.
- Commercial copyright infringement—specifically, for the movie Taken, which was on Megaupload before it was actually available to the public. Also, a second charge for a heap of unspecific albums, ebooks, TV shows, movies, video games, pictures, and software.
I assume that when Dotcom was served, it was cordial and polite.
Oh? You didn’t assume ASSAULT RIFLE HELICOPTER?! Because, for reasons that still aren’t entirely clear, that’s what happened.
Why does the U.S. care so much about what a German-New Zealand pirate does?
Unclear. But I’ll just point out that the MPAA and RIAA—the biggest trade organizations representing Hollywood’s and the record industry’s interests in the U.S., respectively—wield heavy influence in Washington.
That’s especially the case since 2008’s passage of the PRO IP Act, which tasks several law enforcement agencies with protecting American trademark and copyright abroad.
So, he’s finally on trial for something he may have done until 2012.
Nope! This is an extradition hearing. It’s to decide whether Dotcom and his three closets Megaupload companions should be tried in the U.S. because these are U.S. charges. It’s generally thought that the U.S. will be tougher on him than New Zealand.
Kim Dotcom seems pretty guilty—is he totally screwed?
Dotcom has an interesting advocate in his corner, though: Harvard professor, “copyleft” activist, and 2016 presidential candidate Lawrence Lessig, who wrote an affidavit for Dotcom that pokes a lot of holes in the case for extraditing him. Lessig notes that the U.S. is lacking a number of specifics in their charges against Dotcom’s alleged infringement, that the U.S. doesn’t at all show that the anonymous users who uploaded a lot of the files are guilty of willful infringement, and that many of the charges have exceeded their statute of limitations for extradition to the U.S., per its treaty with New Zealand.
If he survives the extradition hearing, and then survives the big charges against him, does he get off scot free?
Heavens no! The music and movie industries hit him with an enormous lawsuit in 2014.
Why does Dotcom tweet so much about Edward Snowden?
I dunno, man. But he does.
I know Dotcom talks a lot about Internet freedom. Is he really some kind of activist, or is he more of a scam artist?
This is another question that could easily be its own piece, but I’ll leave you two points for the former question and one for the latter.
Dotcom did create file storage services that are free to use and, in the case of Mega, are encrypted. And he started the so-called “Internet party” in New Zealand, which proposed, among other things, creating a Bitcoin-like cryptocurrency for the entire country and ending New Zealand’s special intelligence-sharing partnership with the U.S.’s National Security Agency. (It was a bust.) These efforts endear him to Internet-freedom activists.
On the other hand, his problems with the U.S. and New Zealand government can be pretty easily explained by the fact that he’s had to deal with lawsuit, the threat of extradition, the seizure of his stuff, and the fact that he was hit with an armed raid. And while he joins forces with the legion of Internet activists who argue that the pro-copyright industry censors and undermines free expression on the Internet, he did have a business model that benefitted from copyright infringement.
You know that episode of The Office where Michael Scott makes a really embarrassing video of himself as a secret agent? Did Dotcom ever do anything like that back in his hacker days?
Yes. Back when he still went by Kimble.
Has he ever written truly awful poetry about someone at the Department of Justice?
I’ve still got a couple minutes. Can you fill my head with random Kim Dotcom facts?
- Released his debut EDM album, Good Times. Reviewers hated it.
- Not only started the Internet Party, but announced a raging Internet Party party. First he announced an expected attendance of 10,000. Then 15,000. Then he said the government told him he couldn’t do it and he shut it down.
- Saved gamers’ Christmas. After hacker group Lizard Squad pulled the remarkable prank of knocking both XBox Live and the Playstation Network offline with a DDoS attack—think of how many kids were playing with new systems or new games that day!—Dotcom offered them a heap of vouchers to his premium Mega service, and they stopped.
Photo via Robert O’Neill/Wikimedia (CC BY SA 4.0)
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.