- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth 4 Years Ago
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism 4 Years Ago
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Today 9:26 AM
- Leaked documents reveal all the ‘red flags’ about Trump officials Today 9:02 AM
- Elon Musk, who wants to colonize space, thought the moon was Mars Today 8:56 AM
- How to watch ‘Legion’ for free Today 8:46 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Bolívar’ reduces hero’s tale to irredeemable melodrama Today 8:18 AM
- How to watch the U.S. vs. Spain at the World Cup for free Today 7:55 AM
- How to watch ‘The Hills: New Beginnings’ for free Today 7:40 AM
- Inside the pornographic video game that took Kickstarter by storm Today 7:00 AM
- Why everyone wants to debate AOC, and no one wants to debate Ilhan Omar Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Trvl Channel online for free Today 5:30 AM
- Are we going to get a ‘Community’ movie on Netflix? Sunday 2:46 PM
- Kmitting social network bans all posts supporting Trump and his administration Sunday 2:07 PM
- YouTube is testing hiding its comments section Sunday 1:23 PM
UVA frat at the center of Rolling Stone’s retracted rape story plans to sue the magazine
The fraternity called the story ‘a sad example of a serious decline of journalistic standards.’
The University of Virginia fraternity at the center of a controversial and now-retracted Rolling Stone story announced on Monday that it will file a lawsuit against the magazine over the piece.
The announcement comes one day after Rolling Stone published a third-party analysis of the many errors in the sensational story, which accused members of the university’s Phi Kappa Psi fraternity of committing a brutal gang rape.
“The report by Columbia University’s School of Journalism demonstrates the reckless nature in which Rolling Stone researched and failed to verify facts in its article that erroneously accused Phi Kappa Psi of crimes its members did not commit,” UVA Phi Kappa Psi President Stephen Scipione said in a statement. “This type of reporting serves as a sad example of a serious decline of journalistic standards.”
Almost immediately after Rolling Stone published Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s story, entitled “A Rape On Campus,” in November, members of the fraternity reported being ostracized and having their fraternity house vandalized.
Within weeks, numerous holes appeared in the story that cast doubts on Erdely’s reporting process. Erdely based her story almost entirely on the testimony of the supposed victim, identified pseudonymously as “Jackie.”
Among the most egregious errors included the fact that, according to social media and fraternity spending records, Phi Kappa Psi did not host a party on the night that Jackie claimed she was assaulted at a fraternity event.
Despite the lapses documented in the report, Rolling Stone has said it has no plans to fire any of the people involved in the article’s publication. It also said it would not make any significant changes to its fact-checking process.
“Erdely’s reporting records and interviews with participants make clear that the magazine did not pursue important reporting paths even when Jackie had made no request that they refrain,” noted the Columbia report’s authors, a group that included the school’s dean, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Steve Coll. “The editors made judgments about attribution, fact-checking and verification that greatly increased their risks of error but had little or nothing to do with protecting Jackie’s position.”
Photo via Bob Mical/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)
Aaron Sankin is a former Senior Staff Writer at the Daily Dot who covered the intersection of politics, technology, online privacy, Twitter bots, and the role of dank memes in popular culture. He lives in Seattle, Washington. He joined the Center for Investigative Reporting in 2016.