- 6 must-watch college football games to stream this weekend 2 Years Ago
- What is the Hinge dating app, and how does it work? Today 7:00 AM
- ‘Inside Bill’s Brain’ is nothing more than a Bill Gates infomercial Today 6:30 AM
- Swipe This! He hasn’t texted me back. Should I text him again? Today 6:00 AM
- New Loch Ness monster video may just confirm giant eel theory Wednesday 8:04 PM
- Instagram to restrict posts promoting diet culture and plastic surgery Wednesday 6:58 PM
- Apple wants to trademark ‘Slofie,’ its term for slow-motion selfies Wednesday 5:51 PM
- Fortnite leak reveals a Batman crossover event may be happening Wednesday 5:32 PM
- The explosion at a bull semen factory generated a lot of obvious jokes Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Jessica Jaymes, adult film star, dead at 43 Wednesday 4:18 PM
- How to stream Falcons vs. Colts in Week 3 Wednesday 4:05 PM
- Beto O’Rourke says he opposes police use of facial recognition tech Wednesday 4:01 PM
- Lawsuit alleges woman was kidnapped by Lyft driver and gang-raped Wednesday 3:19 PM
- Facebook and Ray-Ban want to replace smartphones with smart glasses Wednesday 3:13 PM
- Sirfetch’d is the gallant new Pokémon winning everyone’s heart Wednesday 3:09 PM
The United States Department of Agriculture has told employees to avoid using the phrase “climate change” in favor of the less politically charged “weather extremes,” according to USDA emails obtained by the Guardian.
USDA’s censorship of “climate change” marks the latest example of pressure from the Trump administration’s to reduce discussions of climate change within the federal government.
The language changes within the USDA came in a February email from Bianca Moebius-Clune, an official from the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service. In addition to ditching “climate change” in favor of “weather extremes,” Moebius-Clune notes that a number of other related terms and phrases would now be on the “avoid” list.
“Climate change adaptation” has been replaced with “resilience to weather extremes.” The phrase “reduce greenhouse gases” was banned in favor of “build soil organic matter, increase nutrient use efficiency.” And “sequester carbon”—the process of capturing carbon dioxide, which contributes to climate change—would also be referred to as “build soil organic matter.”
Moebius-Clune notes in her email that the USDA is not changing “the modeling, just how we talk about it.” Further, the changes appear to be a preemptive measure that anticipated the Trump administration’s position on climate change.
The USDA has not, however, scrubbed all mentions of “climate change” from its web presence. The USDA website still points visitors to a Climate Change Program Office as well as a “climate change adaptation plan,” among other climate change-related pages. Other agencies have gone further in their censorship.
The administration began to scrub the federal government of “climate change” language soon after President Donald Trump‘s inauguration in January. The White House, Department of the Interior, and Environmental Protection Agency have removed information about climate change from their websites. And Trump, who has called climate change a “hoax,” pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord, putting American policy at odds with most of the world.
Read the full USDA emails below:
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.