- Swipe This! Social media makes me feel like my career is lagging. Will I ever catch up? 5 Years Ago
- ‘Zola’ is a surreal and wild tale of a road trip gone wrong Today 5:00 AM
- Sebastian Gorka blocks pundit over Fleshlight joke Today 1:56 AM
- Woman slammed for trying to put UPS driver on blast Sunday 5:23 PM
- Twitter users are sharing which celebrities have blocked them Sunday 4:43 PM
- Conspiracy theorists are already taking advantage of Kobe Bryant’s death Sunday 4:14 PM
- Adam Driver returns to ‘SNL’ as Kylo Ren to reprise role in ‘Undercover Boss’ parody Sunday 3:46 PM
- White men are raging over ‘SNL’s’ white male rage skit Sunday 3:05 PM
- Kobe Bryant dead at 41 Sunday 2:24 PM
- Pete Buttigieg mocked over ‘staged’ walking photo Sunday 12:22 PM
- Louise Linton deletes pro-Greta Thunberg Instagram post Sunday 10:58 AM
- ‘Crip Camp’ shows how a radical summer camp was monumental to the disability rights movement Sunday 9:08 AM
- How to live stream the 2020 Grammy Awards Sunday 7:00 AM
- Technology created deepfakes—does it have a way to stop them, too? Sunday 6:30 AM
- SESTA-FOSTA is ‘detrimental’ to sex workers’ safety, study confirms Sunday 6:00 AM
Sens. Rand Paul and Bill Nelson could have saved NSA reform
Forty two senators voted no. But two of them were more disappointing than others.
To the anguish of privacy advocates, the Senate voted to not reform the National Security Agency’s practices Tuesday evening. Two senators, Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fl.) may deserve more blame than most.
The USA Freedom Act, as the bill is called, fell two votes shy of to 60 required to pass, and in a sense, one could equally blame the bill’s loss on any of the 42 senators who voted no. But Nelson’s and Paul’s votes are particularly curious.
Widely believed to be running for President in 2016 and painted as the token libertarian candidate for the GOP, Paul has long been one of the most outspoken Republicans in the Senate about NSA surveillance. Yet he was not among the four members of his party to vote yes on USA Freedom. Why? Well, for starters, maybe because it only offered some reform, though there’s no better reform bill waiting around the bend.
To his credit, Paul had previously threatened to oppose the bill. That doesn’t make his position any less dicey; in a press release, he seemed to indicate that because the bill extends some provisions of the Patriot Act, he was proud to stand against the USA Freedom Act. That it also prevents the NSA from getting Americans’ phone records without a court order and makes it easier for tech companies to reveal when the government gives hands them secret warrants wasn’t worth it for him.
Also confusing is Sen. Nelson. According to earlier rumors, Nelson, the sole Democrat who opposed the bill, was confused by the vote, and accidentally chose “no,” though he intended to vote for reform. Turns out, that was simply not the case, according to Nelson’s office.
Nelson’s press secretary, Ryan Brown, told the Daily Dot that the senator’s “no” vote was no mistake, and that Nelson’s attitude toward the bill was closer to that of former NSA chief Michael Hayden, who believed it would somehow aid the terrorist group Islamic State.
“[Nelson] believes the bill would have undone a provision allowing for retention of certain telephone records that he feels is helpful in preventing future terrorist attacks,” Brown said.
Regardless of who is to blame, it’s safe to assume Congress won’t save Americans’ privacy any time soon. Maybe now the Supreme Court will step in.
Update 1pm ET, Nov. 19: Article updated to reflect clarifications from Sen. Nelson’s office.
Photo via Rand Paul for U.S. Senate 2010/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.