- Trump continues to demand Apple unlock iPhones for the government 6 Years Ago
- Police officer suspended after video of a handcuffed Delonte West surfaces 6 Years Ago
- ‘Girls don’t want a boyfriend’ meme leaves boyfriends in 2019 6 Years Ago
- Are these tweets about ‘The Bachelor’ or Trump’s impeachment? Today 10:45 AM
- Likely file Saudi prince sent to Jeff Bezos’ to hack his phone revealed Today 10:10 AM
- Will Olivia Jade have to testify against her mother, Lori Loughlin, in bribery trial? Today 10:07 AM
- Gina Rodriguez slammed for promoting ‘American Dirt’ Today 9:26 AM
- Netflix says ‘The Witcher’ is its biggest show. Is it really? Today 8:59 AM
- Tulsi Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for podcast comments Today 8:53 AM
- Lizzo reps Beyoncé’s Ivy Park collection in adult-themed TikTok Today 7:58 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Eye for an Eye’ is a fun but messy thriller about revenge Today 7:00 AM
- Which 2020 Democratic candidates post the most cringe? Today 6:30 AM
- The new ‘Hunger Games’ book paints President Snow as a hero—and people are not happy Tuesday 9:03 PM
- Influencer called out for ‘troubling image’ with Kenyan child Tuesday 8:18 PM
- Professor arrested for spending $185K of grant money on iTunes and strippers Tuesday 7:28 PM
USA Freedom Act loses all support after ‘watered down’ House draft
The new draft is being called “watered down” and “disappointing.”
A new draft of the USA Freedom Act—bipartisan legislation once championed by civil rights activists and major Internet companies alike—includes a “loophole” and “watered-down” language that pushes the bill far short of meaningful reform of NSA operations, say critics, which now includes virtually every major civil liberties group in the U.S.
“This legislation was designed to prohibit bulk collection, but has been made so weak that it fails to adequately protect against mass, untargeted collection of Americans’ private information,” Nuala O’Connor, President and CEO of the Center for Democracy and Technology, said in a statement. “The bill now offers only mild reform and goes against the overwhelming support for definitively ending bulk collection.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) agreed, saying that the latest revisions, crafted in backroom negotiations between House leadership and the Obama administration, “severely weaken the bill, potentially allowing bulk surveillance of records to continue.”
Kevin Bankston, Policy Director of the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, added to the outcry of dissent:
We recognize the need for the USA Freedom Act to move forward now, in order to avoid a worse bill or no bill at all. However, we cannot in good conscience support this weakened version of the bill, where key reforms—especially those intended to end bulk collection and increase transparency—have been substantially watered down.
And Access Senior Policy Counsel Amie Stepanovich said it was “greatly disappointing” that the Freedom Act was “secretly watered down behind closed doors,” which forced the advocacy group to pull its support.
The Reform Government Surveillance Coalition—a group that includes Google, Apple, Yahoo, Microsoft, LinkedIn, AOL, Twitter, and Dropbox—also dropped its support for the Freedom Act, saying in a statement that the latest version has “moved in the wrong direction.”
“The latest draft opens up an unacceptable loophole that could enable the bulk collection of Internet users’ data,” the coalition said. “While it makes important progress, we cannot support this bill as currently drafted and urge Congress to close this loophole to ensure meaningful reform.”
The “loophole” referenced by both the coalition and rights advocacy groups pertains to a modified definition of the “specific selection term,” which determines what data the NSA may legally surveill. Earlier versions of the bill limited the definition to “a term used to uniquely describe a person, entity, or account.” The new version now adds the terms “address” and “device” to the list. It also includes the words “such as,” adding a non-exclusive limit that could allow for broad interpretation.
“Congress has been clear that it wishes to end bulk collection, but given the government’s history of twisted legal interpretations, this language can’t be relied on to protect our freedoms,” says the EFF.
Advocates have also decried the bill’s lack of substantial reform to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments (FISA) Act, which allows for the collection of Americans’ communications data under certain circumstances. The new version of the Freedom Act also weakens disclosures allowed by companies, like Google or Facebook, that are required to hand over user information to the government, critics say.
The House is scheduled to vote on the new version of the USA Freedom Act, which has 140 cosponsors, on Thursday, under closed rules, meaning no amendments may be added. It is expected to pass the Republican-controlled House before moving on to the Senate.
Photo via frederic.jacobs/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.