- This bubble tea challenge is a balancing act 4 Years Ago
- Laura Dern gifts the internet with more ‘Big Little Lies’ memes 4 Years Ago
- The Stonks meme is back—and it’s weirder than ever 4 Years Ago
- Video shows officer threatening to shoot pregnant Black woman in front of her children Today 1:12 PM
- Netflix’s ‘Leila’ tells a familiar dystopian horror story Today 12:37 PM
- O.J. Simpson says in Twitter video that he never slept with Kris Jenner Today 12:06 PM
- GOP commissioner jokes on Facebook about running over Trump protesters Today 11:52 AM
- 2 trans women killed within 3 months in the same neighborhood Today 11:35 AM
- DNC tries to pander with tone-deaf Beyoncé meme, fails miserably Today 10:45 AM
- Parkland grad says Harvard rescinded offer after racist comments surfaced Today 10:10 AM
- ‘The Edge of Democracy’ chronicles the downfall of Brazil’s political leaders Today 9:42 AM
- Suzanne Collins is writing a ‘Hunger Games’ prequel Today 9:31 AM
- KSI rips Logan Paul for delay in their YouTube boxing rematch Today 9:02 AM
- Trump kicks chief of staff out of Oval Office for coughing during interview Today 8:29 AM
- Netflix announces Samurai version of ‘Game of Thrones’ Today 8:10 AM
U.S. urges E.U. court to keep data-sharing agreement, despite NSA concerns
The international fallout from Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations continues.
The United States wants Europe’s top court to preserve a data-sharing agreement between them, countering a top European adviser who argued that U.S. mass surveillance invalidated the agreement’s privacy protections.
Yves Bot, an advocate general for the European Court of Justice, had last week advised the European Court of Justice to rule in a current case that European countries could prohibit U.S. companies from gathering certain data from their citizens. The U.S.–E.U. Safe Harbor data-sharing agreement permits that data collection based on the understanding that companies will safeguard the data, but Bot wrote that the United States’ “mass, indiscriminate surveillance” precluded that privacy guarantee.
Responding to the ruling in a statement issued Monday, the U.S. Mission to the European Union sharply criticized Bot’s legal advice, arguing that it “rests on numerous inaccurate assertions about intelligence practices of the United States.”
“The United States does not and has not engaged in indiscriminate surveillance of anyone, including ordinary European citizens,” the government argued. It called the PRISM program, exposed by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, “targeted” and “duly authorized by law.”
The statement also claimed that President Barack Obama had overseen “unprecedented steps to enhance transparency and public accountability” around surveillance programs.
The United States and Europe are negotiating changes to the Safe Harbor agreement, and a top U.S. official said last December that the two sides had made “a great deal of progress.”
American officials have repeatedly stressed that the agreement is critically important to U.S. businesses’ European operations, but the U.S. mission’s statement also cast the ECJ court case in broader terms, suggesting that an adverse ruling for the United States could jeopardize all agreements between the E.U. and other parties.
“The underlying issue here also goes far beyond the Safe Harbor Framework,” the statement said. “The Advocate General’s reasoning would undercut the ability of other countries, businesses and citizens to rely upon negotiated arrangements with the European Commission.”
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.