- ‘Storm Area 51’ creator says its gotten so big he’s worried about the FBI 4 Years Ago
- Everyone loves Q baby, the baby who apparently supports QAnon 4 Years Ago
- Thread about ‘depression meals’ is inspiring lots of relatable answers Today 9:36 AM
- How long is ‘Avengers: Infinity War’? Today 9:30 AM
- Rand Paul ripped for halting 9/11 Victim Fund re-authorization bill Today 9:18 AM
- Here’s what’s coming and going on Hulu in August 2019 Today 7:00 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ creators drop out of Comic-Con at last minute Today 6:38 AM
- Inside Britt McHenry’s war on women Today 6:30 AM
- The glorious highs and unexpected quirks of 4K streaming Today 6:00 AM
- Southwest Airlines passengers receive free Nintendo Switch consoles and Mario Maker 2 Wednesday 9:10 PM
- The Deplorable Choir drops diss track aimed at 4 congresswomen from Trump’s racist tweets Wednesday 8:09 PM
- Florida city is pushing homeless people out by playing ‘Baby Shark’ on a loop Wednesday 7:27 PM
- A ‘Gossip Girl’ reboot is coming to HBO Max–and fans are not happy with the casting details Wednesday 6:44 PM
- Beto can’t leverage his slave owner ancestry to gain Black voters’ trust Wednesday 5:51 PM
- Oakland to become the third U.S. city to ban facial recognition Wednesday 5:50 PM
A proposed deal between the U.S. and China to treat cyberattacks like other weapons is the first of its kind.
President Obama and China’s President Xi Jinping will likely negotiate the agreement next week when President Xi visits Washington, D.C., and the outcome could be announced Friday.
The New York Times calls it “the first arms control accord for cyberspace.” The agreement would likely protect infrastructure like power plants and hospitals from cyberattacks during peacetime, but would not apply in situations similar to the recent high-profile hack on the Office of Personnel Management, in which government employee information was stolen.
A senior administration official told the New York Times that the agreement between Presidents Obama and Xi would likely be a “generic embrace” of a United Nations code of conduct that prohibits damaging critical infrastructure.
However, such a generic agreement would not address the cyberattacks that have grabbed headlines in the U.S., like the OPM hack that the U.S. attributed to China. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper recently told Congress that the OPM hack was not considered an attack—and therefore it would not be governed by the agreement currently under negotiation. “There was no destruction of data or manipulation of data,” Clapper said. “It was simply stolen. So that’s a passive intelligence collection activity, just as we do.”
But an initial agreement over critical infrastructure could eventually extend to data collection and other areas, the Times reports. Tracking the agreement’s effects could be difficult, however—tracing an online attack back to its origin is not a simple task, making it hard to tell if either government is living up to its end of the bargain.
H/T The New York Times | Illustration by Max Fleishman
Kate Conger is a politics and cybersecurity journalist who currently writes for Gizmodo. Her work has previously appeared in BuzzFeed, Digital Trends, Real Clear Politics, San Francisco Examiner, and elsewhere. Together with Dell Cameron, she won the Society of Professional Journalists' award for Best Scoop in 2017 for a report on the leak of data about 200 million American voters.