- ‘Due to personal reasons’ meme enables questionable behavior Today 3:36 PM
- Why do white rappers write lyrics about being good hypothetical dads? Today 3:29 PM
- Roger Stone posts, then deletes, Instagram of his judge with small crosshairs next to her Today 2:32 PM
- People are Googling Rihanna and their birthday in a Twitter challenge Today 2:13 PM
- Here are all of the Fortnite earthquake cracks thus far Today 1:21 PM
- New Apex Legends characters leaked by data miners Today 12:36 PM
- Ken Jeong falls back on crude humor and lazy stereotypes in ‘You Complete Me, Ho’ Today 12:24 PM
- 14 artsy cartoon mugs that’ll help make your days more creative Today 12:15 PM
- Netflix cancels ‘Jessica Jones’ and ‘The Punisher’ Today 11:26 AM
- YouTube is fueling the rise in flat earth believers Today 11:04 AM
- Review: Crackdown 3 is not a world worth saving Today 11:00 AM
- Scathing privacy report calls Facebook a ‘digital gangster’ Today 10:50 AM
- 21 Savage goes deep on 21 Savage memes Today 10:49 AM
- Everyone is debating the number of towels you should own Today 10:47 AM
- How to unlock the Fortnite Prisoner stage 4 skin Today 10:45 AM
Get ready for a new type of election controversy.
NBC News published a story late Friday claiming the Russian propaganda machine had started its 2020 campaign by publishing support for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), who declared last month she would seek the presidency.
According to NBC, Gabbard is already a “favorite” of Moscow, with Russian state-owned news sites publishing stories like “Heroic Tulsi Gabbard Will Run on Her Sensible Foreign Policy. Expect Democrats, Faux Progressives to Squeal.”
Since Gabbard announced her intention to run on Jan. 11, there have been at least 20 Gabbard stories on three major Moscow-based English-language websites affiliated with or supportive of the Russian government: RT, the Russian-owned TV outlet; Sputnik News, a radio outlet; and Russia Insider, a blog that experts say closely follows the Kremlin line.
Yesterday, Gabbard pushed back against that story, by tweeting a report from the Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald. In Greenwald’s piece, he noted that the firm NBC used as its source for the story, New Knowledge, was accused of pushing propaganda for Democrats in the Alabama special election in 2017 by the New York Times.
When the Times reported on New Knowledge, the organization originally claimed it was just testing to see if those types of tactics could be recreated. However, the group called it a false flag operation that “planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the report says.
Gabbard latched onto the idea that by using New Knowledge as its source, the NBC article was false.
@ggreenwald exposes that @NBC used journalistic fraud to discredit our campaign. But more important is their motive: “to smear any adversary of the establishment wing of the Democratic Party – whether on the left or the right – as a stooge or asset of the Kremlin.” https://t.co/JnROpficM9
— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) February 3, 2019
As commander-in-chief, I will work to end the new cold war, nuclear arms race and slide into nuclear war. That is why the neocon/neolib warmongers will do anything to stop me. https://t.co/MPybv8AZ5p
— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) February 4, 2019
Gabbard is an interesting case, because she does have some foreign policy objectives that align with Russia, so it would make sense that a candidate who is known as an Assad apologist is seeing favorable tweets and headlines from some sort of Russian apparatus.
But even her denial of being a Russian asset was somehow confusing because people believe Greenwald—given his work with Edward Snowden—is a Kremlin propagandist himself.
— Caroline Orr (@RVAwonk) February 4, 2019
So the story goes: Russian propagandists may or may not have launched a campaign to support Gabbard, who may or may not be a Kremlin asset, but you can’t believe that claim because it was made by an American company who lied about shady Russian tactics … but you can’t believe that assessment, because it’s been pushed by a journalist compromised by Russia.
Of course not. But the important thing is that all these arguments are irrelevant. If the simple understanding is that the Russian government, which worked to elect Trump in 2016, would like him to win in 2020, Russia will likely seize on any candidate that can help put a wrench in the primary process. If promoting Gabbard throws Dems in a tizzy, it’ll be great.
If Gabbard somehow wins the primary, it’s unlikely she’ll have a Russian apparatus pushing for her election to the Oval Office over Trump. Confusion and controversy is what the Russians want—not actual support of any Democrat.
David Covucci is the Layer 8 editor at the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the web. His work has appeared in Vice, the Huffington Post, Jezebel, Gothamist, and other publications. He is particularly interested in hearing any tips you have. Reach out at [email protected]