- This woman told two students to ‘speak English’ and people are not having it Friday 9:53 PM
- Iconic 1968 drag documentary ‘The Queen’ finally released on Netflix Friday 9:29 PM
- This TikTok account for Chancellor Palpatine is hilarious Friday 8:43 PM
- Did the Space Force logo rip off Star Trek? Friday 6:24 PM
- Disabled people with service dogs say Uber, Lyft drivers are denying them rides Friday 3:25 PM
- TikTok teen famous for greasy hair ends her 8-year reign Friday 2:48 PM
- Police handcuff brown man at subway station for carrying a toy gun Friday 1:20 PM
- Fake clip of Sanders quoting infamous ‘hot chip’ tweet is duping people online Friday 1:16 PM
- The Mars Volta’s Cedric Bixler-Zavala alleges Scientologists behind dog’s death Friday 12:46 PM
- Eminem responds to critics: ‘This album was not made for the squeamish’ Friday 12:42 PM
- ‘The poet, the poem’ meme takes iconic lines and turns them into art Friday 12:40 PM
- People are making dark memes about the coronavirus Friday 12:27 PM
- Trump camp’s ‘head on a pike’ impeachment threat hit with memes Friday 11:34 AM
- What is the #FreeBritney movement, and why is Cher tweeting about it? Friday 10:52 AM
- This YouTuber claims the Saudi government plotted to kidnap him on U.S. soil Friday 10:30 AM
Suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices at U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional, a federal court in Boston ruled on Tuesday.
The decision was made after a lawsuit was brought forth by numerous civil liberties groups on behalf of 11 individuals who had their phones and laptops searched by federal agents.
The group of travelers were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and ACLU of Massachusetts.
BREAKING: In a major victory for privacy, a federal court ruled today that the government’s suspicionless searches of international travelers’ smartphones and laptops at airports and other U.S. ports of entry violate the Fourth Amendment. pic.twitter.com/SJDIERJdV5— ACLU (@ACLU) November 12, 2019
The EFF states that the ruling bars Customs and Border Control (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from searching devices at locations such as airports and the U.S.-Mexico border unless agents have “individualized suspicion of illegal contraband.”
Esha Bhandari, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, says the court’s decision puts an end to “suspicionless fishing expeditions” that have become commonplace across the country.
“This ruling significantly advances Fourth Amendment protections for millions of international travelers who enter the United States every year,” Bhandari said in a statement. “By putting an end to the government’s ability to conduct suspicionless fishing expeditions, the court reaffirms that the border is not a lawless place and that we don’t lose our privacy rights when we travel.”
Statistics show the number of searches by federal agents at ports of entry has dramatically increased over the past several years. In 2018, more than 33,000 searches were carried out by CBP alone.
The EFF cites numerous incidents in which federal agents used their power to search through sensitive information, including attorney-client communications. Another case surrounds an immigration officer at a Boston airport who denied a Harvard student entry. The officer’s decision was made after he reportedly took issue with social media posts from the student’s friends in which they criticized the U.S. government.
- Report: CBP contractor hack was vast, revealed plans for border surveillance
- CBP reportedly knew about the secret Border Patrol Facebook group for years
- In wake of developer protest, software firm cuts ties with ICE
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.