- What is the TikTok drink and can you still get it? Thursday 9:27 PM
- “Party, Party, Party” TikTok meme grapples with party culture Thursday 8:43 PM
- Baby Yoda was just added to Sims 4 Thursday 7:54 PM
- Religious conservatives petition Netflix to pull ‘gay Jesus’ Christmas comedy Thursday 7:19 PM
- Kylie Jenner criticized for yet another expensive car post Thursday 5:57 PM
- Apex Legends became a major Pornhub search in 2019 Thursday 5:15 PM
- CBS accidentally interviewed InfoWars host as regular Trump supporter Thursday 4:31 PM
- TLC accused of fatphobia, fetishization with show about ‘mixed-weight’ couples Thursday 3:41 PM
- Betting odds show KSI could fight FaZe Sensei, Jake Paul, or Justin Bieber next Thursday 3:20 PM
- Nick Cannon releases another thirsty Eminem diss track Thursday 2:59 PM
- Dogs at polling stations are helping bark out the vote in the U.K. Thursday 1:00 PM
- Streamers dominated Pornhub searches in 2019 Thursday 12:59 PM
- Pro and anti-boot factions emerge in wake of ‘Wonder Woman 1984’ trailer Thursday 12:31 PM
- The ‘Rise of Skywalker’ press tour has turned into a rehash of ‘The Last Jedi’ Thursday 12:18 PM
- What’s in a TikTok username? Thursday 12:00 PM
Suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices at U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional, a federal court in Boston ruled on Tuesday.
The decision was made after a lawsuit was brought forth by numerous civil liberties groups on behalf of 11 individuals who had their phones and laptops searched by federal agents.
The group of travelers were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and ACLU of Massachusetts.
BREAKING: In a major victory for privacy, a federal court ruled today that the government’s suspicionless searches of international travelers’ smartphones and laptops at airports and other U.S. ports of entry violate the Fourth Amendment. pic.twitter.com/SJDIERJdV5— ACLU (@ACLU) November 12, 2019
The EFF states that the ruling bars Customs and Border Control (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from searching devices at locations such as airports and the U.S.-Mexico border unless agents have “individualized suspicion of illegal contraband.”
Esha Bhandari, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, says the court’s decision puts an end to “suspicionless fishing expeditions” that have become commonplace across the country.
“This ruling significantly advances Fourth Amendment protections for millions of international travelers who enter the United States every year,” Bhandari said in a statement. “By putting an end to the government’s ability to conduct suspicionless fishing expeditions, the court reaffirms that the border is not a lawless place and that we don’t lose our privacy rights when we travel.”
Statistics show the number of searches by federal agents at ports of entry has dramatically increased over the past several years. In 2018, more than 33,000 searches were carried out by CBP alone.
The EFF cites numerous incidents in which federal agents used their power to search through sensitive information, including attorney-client communications. Another case surrounds an immigration officer at a Boston airport who denied a Harvard student entry. The officer’s decision was made after he reportedly took issue with social media posts from the student’s friends in which they criticized the U.S. government.
- Report: CBP contractor hack was vast, revealed plans for border surveillance
- CBP reportedly knew about the secret Border Patrol Facebook group for years
- In wake of developer protest, software firm cuts ties with ICE
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.