- ‘The Mandalorian’ comes to a crossroads in Chapter 3 8 Years Ago
- Apple TV’s ‘Servant’ will make you scared of reborn dolls 8 Years Ago
- Lindsey Graham roasted for turning his back on a veteran 8 Years Ago
- Scooter Braun asks Taylor Swift for ‘resolution’ after allegedly getting death threats 8 Years Ago
- ‘Frozen 2’ plays it safe and lacks the magic of the original 8 Years Ago
- Graphic video shows police pinning man face-down in subway station 8 Years Ago
- Mini-documentary shows Trump supporters clashing at Denny’s Today 11:52 AM
- Here’s why ‘Furry and Proud’ is trending on Twitter Today 11:16 AM
- Sacha Baron Cohen calls tech giants the ‘greatest propaganda machine in history’ Today 11:04 AM
- ‘Resistance Reborn’ is a must-read before ‘The Rise of Skywalker’ Today 10:14 AM
- Stephen Miller should be fired, more than 100 lawmakers say Today 9:56 AM
- YouTube star Bretman Rock goes off on fans who wanted selfies during his dad’s funeral Today 9:14 AM
- The U.S. Army is reevaluating its use of TikTok after security concerns Today 8:45 AM
- Nurse’s TikTok video accused of being insensitive to patient trauma Today 8:16 AM
- The tweet showing a man talking to a woman in a club is gone but not forgotten Today 8:00 AM
Supreme Court denies file-sharing case
Joel Tenebaum was charged in 2007 for illegally downloading 30 songs on Kazaaand sentenced for $675,000 in damages.
Lawsuits that deal with illegal downloading have gone to the highest courts in some countries.
But the Supreme Court of the United States isn’t yet ready to hear them.
Instead, Joel Tenenbaum, who was charged in 2007 for illegally downloading 30 songs on the peer-to-peer file-sharing software program Kazaa, was denied his appeal to plead his case before the Supreme Court on Monday.
“Tenenbaum is a fine and courageous young man who has just received his doctorate in statistical physics,” read Tenenbaum’s request for a writ of certiorari, or to be heard by the SCOTUS. It quoted the judge when he first went to trial, Nancy Gertner, who has since retired:
“Counsel representing the record companies have an ethical obligation to fully understand that they are fighting people without lawyers, to understand that the formalities of this are basically bankrupting people.”
The request also noted that the plaintiff, the Recording Industry Association of America, had stated in a press release that their main goal in suing Tenenbaum wasn’t actually meant to reflect damages, but instead to make an example to other would-be pirates.
Nevertheless, the SCOTUS’s denial was swift, devoting only two sentences to dismiss Tenenbaum’s request.
“The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief Justice and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.”
Instead, Tenenbaum will be forced to pay up.
How much, exactly, is up to yet another court. The case is now set for a district court in Boston, which will decide damages. At different points in his case, Tenenbaum has been sentenced to fines of between $67,500 and $675,000 for the 30 songs.
Photo by kjetil_r
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.