- Trump retweeted a QAnon supporter during his Twitter bender Today 1:24 PM
- Katrina Pierson supports Trump tweeting more about Fox than New Zealand shooting Today 1:19 PM
- PewDiePie’s alt-right ties are impossible to ignore Today 1:05 PM
- With this blade, I protect this meme Today 12:48 PM
- Lead actress in ‘The Color Purple’ revival criticized for homophobic post Today 12:39 PM
- ‘Arrested Development’ ends the same way it did the first time—unceremoniously Today 12:10 PM
- Alleged gunman tried to rob YouTuber Adam22 during livestream Today 11:32 AM
- Turkish president used New Zealand shooting footage at campaign rallies Today 11:09 AM
- 8 adorable tea infusers that will warm you with cuteness Today 10:26 AM
- The Super Nintendo Pro is the wireless controller of your dreams Today 10:25 AM
- Lori Loughlin reportedly dropped from ‘Fuller House’ final season Today 10:10 AM
- The Legend of Zelda Encyclopedia Deluxe Edition is a true treasure Today 10:00 AM
- Even Republicans are angry with the GOP’s anti-Beto tweet Today 10:00 AM
- ‘Egg Boy’ vows to send GoFundMe money to mosque shooting victims Today 9:55 AM
- Noom is a weight loss program that prioritizes your mental health Today 9:10 AM
Senate proposal would require police to hold warrant before snooping through your old emails
The Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Thursday for a law that should make online snooping more difficult.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Thursday for an amendment requiring law enforcement representatives to secure a warrant before reading emails and other electronic messages that are more than six months old.
If passed, the change would make online spying more difficult. Currently, law enforcement require only an administrative subpoena—which doesn’t need a judge’s signature—to read messages that are over 180 days old.
The amendment, authored by committee chair Sen. Patrick Leahy, D.-Vt., was attached to H.R. 2471, a measure to modernize the Video Privacy Protection Act. This act, supported by Netflix, would allow social media users to elect to automatically share online video they have watched.
The law, as it is currently applied, comes out of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1986. As the Washington newspaper The Hill notes, lawmakers at the time “failed to anticipate that email providers would offer massive online storage. They assumed that if a person hadn’t downloaded and deleted an email within six months, it could be considered abandoned and wouldn’t require strict privacy protections.”
Opponents of the amendment, such as Sen. Chuck Grassley, R.-Iowa, believe it will delay law enforcement in time-sensitive crimes, such as kidnapping.
The Senate will vote on the act, and its attached amendment, during its next session, likely after the presidential election in November.
Photo by cliff1066/Flickr
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers