- Baltimore still refuses to pay hackers who hit city with ransomware 7 Years Ago
- Net neutrality advocates slam ‘extremely troubling’ letter circulating among some House Dems Today 4:52 PM
- Moms and grandmas are infiltrating TikTok Today 4:35 PM
- Did Britain’s head Brexiter hide in a bus to avoid getting hit by a milkshake? Today 4:26 PM
- This woman who thought she saw a handmaid about to jump from a building is very relieved Today 4:18 PM
- Michael Avenatti allegedly defrauded Stormy Daniels to pay for a Ferrari Today 3:53 PM
- HBO has no plans for an Arya Stark spinoff series Today 3:28 PM
- Republicans and Democrats agree on dangers of facial recognition tech Today 3:18 PM
- Amazon is using video games and ‘swag bucks’ to incentivize workers Today 3:04 PM
- Here’s what’s coming and going on Netflix in June Today 2:46 PM
- This Michael Jackson makeup meme is sweeping TikTok Today 2:45 PM
- Homophobic preacher wants Pete Buttigieg to renounce fisting and rimming Today 2:33 PM
- ‘The Liar, the Snitch, and the War Crimes’: Twitter roasts news of Trump Jr. book deal Today 12:36 PM
- Polar Peak in Fortnite is cracking, and players think a dragon may be beneath the ice Today 12:07 PM
- ‘Rise of Skywalker’ first look reveals mysterious new characters Today 12:00 PM
Senate proposal would require police to hold warrant before snooping through your old emails
The Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Thursday for a law that should make online snooping more difficult.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Thursday for an amendment requiring law enforcement representatives to secure a warrant before reading emails and other electronic messages that are more than six months old.
If passed, the change would make online spying more difficult. Currently, law enforcement require only an administrative subpoena—which doesn’t need a judge’s signature—to read messages that are over 180 days old.
The amendment, authored by committee chair Sen. Patrick Leahy, D.-Vt., was attached to H.R. 2471, a measure to modernize the Video Privacy Protection Act. This act, supported by Netflix, would allow social media users to elect to automatically share online video they have watched.
The law, as it is currently applied, comes out of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1986. As the Washington newspaper The Hill notes, lawmakers at the time “failed to anticipate that email providers would offer massive online storage. They assumed that if a person hadn’t downloaded and deleted an email within six months, it could be considered abandoned and wouldn’t require strict privacy protections.”
Opponents of the amendment, such as Sen. Chuck Grassley, R.-Iowa, believe it will delay law enforcement in time-sensitive crimes, such as kidnapping.
The Senate will vote on the act, and its attached amendment, during its next session, likely after the presidential election in November.
Photo by cliff1066/Flickr
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers