- ‘Friends’ gets reunion special on HBO Max, fans go wild Friday 7:37 PM
- Why you should drop everything and start reading ‘Lore Olympus’ Friday 6:27 PM
- ‘Boogaloo’ memes are trying to organize a second civil war—and they’re spreading fast Friday 3:48 PM
- People are disturbed by these McDonald’s-scented candles Friday 3:47 PM
- Season 2 of ‘The Witcher’ is in production Friday 3:16 PM
- Here are some cringey billboards Bloomberg ran in Arizona Friday 2:51 PM
- PewDiePie returns to YouTube after 37-day hiatus Friday 2:01 PM
- Why was a Republican Party Facebook page co-managed by someone in Turkmenistan? Friday 1:26 PM
- The shorthand guide to ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ Friday 1:07 PM
- Congress urges Tinder to screen for sex offenders Friday 1:03 PM
- Video shows 9-year-old threatening suicide after being bullied Friday 12:01 PM
- Ex-Goldman Sachs CEO says he might vote Trump because Sanders is too mean to him Friday 11:40 AM
- Twitch streamer says she was banned for body painting Friday 11:39 AM
- Did BTS fans really cause TikTok to crash? (updated) Friday 11:08 AM
- People are selling homemade tampons on Etsy Friday 11:01 AM
Senate defeats Cybersecurity Act for the second time
How many times does the Senate have to vote down this Internet bill before it gets the picture?
In a sense, absurdly-tweeting Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) was right: the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 (CSA), which the Senate voted down yet again Wednesday, is “a little bit like the movie Groundhog Day.”
In other words, it’s the second time that the CSA was defeated in the Senate. Meant to address the U.S.’s reportedly dire need for stronger protection from cyber attacks, its provisions still give privacy advocates a number of concerns. It even lost a backer since the last vote in August. Now at 51-47, it was far from the 60 votes necessary to pass.
It was the same old arguments from both the CSA’s supporters and detractors. Supporters of the bill, like Susan Collins (R-Maine), compared cyber attacks on American infrastructure to a “cyber 9/11” and “digital Pearl Harbor.”
Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), who authored the bill, said, “our cyber enemies are at the gates. They’ve broken through the gates.”
Meanwhile, opponents like Grassley decried it, largely for not being the Cyber Intelligence Security Protection Act (CISPA), which would make it easier for government agencies to access any network that’s under attack. The drawback to that plan, for privacy advocates, is that citizens’ private files are then in the government’s possession.
President Obama has repeatedly threatened to issue an executive order on cybersecurity if Congress doesn’t agree on one, which now seems to clearly be the case.
“What an unfortunate thing,” said Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). “Cybersecurity is dead for this Congress.”
That might be a good thing, or at least the lesser of two evils, when it comes to protecting your privacy, though. While every proposed cybersecurity bill has rankled advocates to some degree or another, Obama’s executive order, which is based on the CSA, is said to contain at least some privacy protections.
Specifically, the executive order would (in its current form, which is subject to change) make a clear distinction between what counts as critical infrastructure—power grids, railroad systems—and social networking, like Facebook and Google search history. Tougher controls can apply to the former while leaving the latter alone. At least one senator with a history of Internet advocacy, Ron Wyden (D-Oreg.), has a history of pushing for such a distinction, and, as the CSA never actually made it, voted against the CSA both times.
Image via C-Span
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.