- A police union is urging its officers to post ‘The Punisher’ logo Monday 7:33 PM
- Redditors call for a Nestlé boycott through memes Monday 6:16 PM
- How a 10-second Disney jingle became a meme in Thailand Monday 4:48 PM
- Instagram users share photos showing gruesome killing of 17-year-old Bianca Devins Monday 4:33 PM
- The horror game banned for mocking China’s president probably isn’t coming back Monday 3:31 PM
- Cheap vibrators, condoms, and lube: The most satisfying Amazon Prime Day deals Monday 3:07 PM
- George R.R. Martin says fan backlash won’t affect his ‘Game of Thrones’ ending Monday 3:03 PM
- The very finest Area 51 memes Monday 2:52 PM
- Tweet map ranks states where people are boycotting Amazon Prime Day Monday 1:54 PM
- Lil Nas X says he will perform at Area 51 for free Monday 12:56 PM
- The best Prime Day deals for gamers Monday 12:53 PM
- How Republicans are dancing around Trump’s racist tweets Monday 12:42 PM
- Not even anti-immigrant groups are defending Trump’s ‘go back’ tweets Monday 12:37 PM
- Netflix’s latest chase thriller ‘Point Blank’ lacks electricity Monday 12:27 PM
- Jay Inslee floats Megan Rapinoe as his secretary of state pick Monday 11:33 AM
House fails to pass amendment curbing government surveillance
Gage Skidmore/Flickr (CC-BY-SA)
The amendment was backed by a number of civil rights and internet rights groups.
The House of Representatives voted on Tuesday against an amendment that would have reigned in some warrantless government surveillance under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The amendment was introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). It has the backing of a number of internet rights and civil rights groups including Fight for the Future, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), among others.
The House voted 175-253 against it on Tuesday.
Section 702 allows the National Security Agency (NSA) to collect information on foreign targets without a warrant. However, Americans’ communications can be part of what is collected when they talk with non-U.S. citizens abroad.
The amendment from Amash and Lofgren would have withheld funding for Section 702 unless the government commits to not “knowingly collect the data of people communicating from within the U.S. to other U.S. residents, and who are not specifically communicating with a foreign surveillance target,” according to EFF.
The ACLU noted that the amendment would block funding for Section 702 where “neither party to a communication is a foreign surveillance target” and “communication is entirely domestic.”
“This amendment would have finally closed legal loopholes that the U.S. government has abused to conduct sickening and pervasive monitoring and collection of the most intimate details of our lives,” Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement. “Congress should do their job by defending the Constitution and enacting comprehensive legislation to ban mass government spying, outlaw use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, and hold corporations accountable for collecting and misusing our data.”
The amendment also garnered support of some lawmakers in the Senate, like Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who before the vote, urged for it to pass.
.@justinamash and @RepZoeLofgren have been longtime partners in the fight to protect Americans' privacy by supporting my bill with @RandPaul to fight warrantless surveillance of American citizens. The House must pass their amendment to preserve Americans' civil liberties. https://t.co/NYRCMBVerK— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) June 18, 2019
- Meet the home brewer turning beer into a case for net neutrality
- Twitter suspends new accounts involved in state-sponsored misinformation
- Democrats try to force vote on Save the Internet Act net neutrality bill
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).