- Conservatives are fighting over whether porn is OK 6 Months Ago
- The best in tech gifts for women this year 6 Months Ago
- Why do the Golden Globes keep sidelining women filmmakers? 6 Months Ago
- Netflix dominates with 34 Golden Globe nominations across TV and film 6 Months Ago
- Ethan Klein has declared war on K-pop—and K-pop fans 6 Months Ago
- People are not happy with Steve Harvey’s cartel comment to Miss Colombia 6 Months Ago
- The decade conspiracy theories overtook the truth Today 9:14 AM
- Marianne Williamson duped into believing Trump pardoned Charles Manson Today 8:55 AM
- TikTok users are freaking out about ‘predicting’ Juice WRLD’s death Today 7:59 AM
- @MugJerry and the quest for Instagram justice Today 7:00 AM
- Angela Abar wrestles with destiny in ‘Watchmen’ episode 8 Sunday 9:05 PM
- Guy who runs Trump Organization Twitter account caught hyping up own tweet Sunday 4:51 PM
- People found out how tall Olaf is–and now ‘Frozen’ is terrifying Sunday 3:41 PM
- Rapper Juice WRLD dead at 21 Sunday 3:02 PM
- Embody Andrew Yang, fight other presidential candidates in video game Sunday 2:33 PM
The House of Representatives voted on Tuesday against an amendment that would have reigned in some warrantless government surveillance under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The amendment was introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). It has the backing of a number of internet rights and civil rights groups including Fight for the Future, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), among others.
The House voted 175-253 against it on Tuesday.
Section 702 allows the National Security Agency (NSA) to collect information on foreign targets without a warrant. However, Americans’ communications can be part of what is collected when they talk with non-U.S. citizens abroad.
The amendment from Amash and Lofgren would have withheld funding for Section 702 unless the government commits to not “knowingly collect the data of people communicating from within the U.S. to other U.S. residents, and who are not specifically communicating with a foreign surveillance target,” according to EFF.
The ACLU noted that the amendment would block funding for Section 702 where “neither party to a communication is a foreign surveillance target” and “communication is entirely domestic.”
“This amendment would have finally closed legal loopholes that the U.S. government has abused to conduct sickening and pervasive monitoring and collection of the most intimate details of our lives,” Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement. “Congress should do their job by defending the Constitution and enacting comprehensive legislation to ban mass government spying, outlaw use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, and hold corporations accountable for collecting and misusing our data.”
The amendment also garnered support of some lawmakers in the Senate, like Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who before the vote, urged for it to pass.
.@justinamash and @RepZoeLofgren have been longtime partners in the fight to protect Americans' privacy by supporting my bill with @RandPaul to fight warrantless surveillance of American citizens. The House must pass their amendment to preserve Americans' civil liberties. https://t.co/NYRCMBVerK— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) June 18, 2019
- Meet the home brewer turning beer into a case for net neutrality
- Twitter suspends new accounts involved in state-sponsored misinformation
- Democrats try to force vote on Save the Internet Act net neutrality bill
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).