- Religious conservatives petition Netflix to pull ‘gay Jesus’ Christmas comedy Thursday 7:19 PM
- Kylie Jenner criticized for yet another expensive car post Thursday 5:57 PM
- Apex Legends became a major Pornhub search in 2019 Thursday 5:15 PM
- CBS accidentally interviewed InfoWars host as regular Trump supporter Thursday 4:31 PM
- TLC accused of fatphobia, fetishization with show about ‘mixed-weight’ couples Thursday 3:41 PM
- Betting odds show KSI could fight FaZe Sensei, Jake Paul, or Justin Bieber next Thursday 3:20 PM
- Nick Cannon releases another thirsty Eminem diss track Thursday 2:59 PM
- Dogs at polling stations are helping bark out the vote in the U.K. Thursday 1:00 PM
- Streamers dominated Pornhub searches in 2019 Thursday 12:59 PM
- Pro and anti-boot factions emerge in wake of ‘Wonder Woman 1984’ trailer Thursday 12:31 PM
- The ‘Rise of Skywalker’ press tour has turned into a rehash of ‘The Last Jedi’ Thursday 12:18 PM
- What’s in a TikTok username? Thursday 12:00 PM
- All four of 2020’s Marvel/DC movies are directed by women Thursday 11:57 AM
- Jeremy Corbyn Rickrolls everyone ahead of British election Thursday 10:18 AM
- Trisha Paytas denies accidentally exposing herself on TikTok Thursday 10:04 AM
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) on Tuesday released answers he received from Amazon from questions he asked in September and October. Amazon, which owns Ring, has faced scrutiny over its partnerships with law enforcement agencies for months.
Within the letters, the retail giant says it “does not require law enforcement to delete materials shared through a video request after a certain period of time,” adding that agencies may be “subject to local record keeping laws” and that they may need the videos to “complete ongoing investigations.”
In addition, Ring told the senator that it does not require law enforcement agencies to have any “evidentiary standard” when requesting footage captured on the doorbells. Through the agreements with law enforcement, Ring users can allow for those agencies to request footage through a Neighbors portal.
“Connected doorbells are well on their way to becoming a mainstay of American households, and the lack of privacy and civil rights protections for innocent residents is nothing short of chilling,” Markey said in a statement. “Amazon Ring’s policies are an open door for privacy and civil liberty violations.”
Markey also criticized Ring’s policy for allowing law enforcement to request footage for a maximum time of 12 hours that can cover a half a mile, and for videos that are up to 45 days old. Amazon told the senator that while the terms of service require that a Ring doorbell only capture their own property, it “does not view users’ videos to verify compliance” with the rules.
“If you’re an adult walking your dog or a child playing on the sidewalk, you shouldn’t have to worry that Ring’s products are amassing footage of you and that law enforcement may hold that footage indefinitely or share that footage with any third parties,” Markey continued in his statement. “Amazon’s Ring is marketed to help keep families safe, but privacy rights are in real danger as a result of company policies. Amazon is not doing enough to ensure that its products and practices do not run afoul of our civil liberties.”
A spokesperson for Ring’s Neighbors portal told the Washington Post that they designed it to make sure users can decide whether they want to share footage with police.
“Ring users place their trust in us to help protect their homes and communities, and we take that responsibility very seriously,” the spokesperson told the news outlet.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).