- ‘Game of Thrones’ failed women—and it’s a shame on its legacy Today 7:40 AM
- How to use Tor, the network that lets you browse the web anonymously Today 7:30 AM
- How to live stream Devin Haney vs. Antonio Moran on DAZN Today 7:00 AM
- Trump’s transphobic policies are disgusting—but they aren’t new Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Copa del Rey Final online for free Today 5:45 AM
- How to watch the DFB-Pokal final for free Today 5:30 AM
- Curvy Wife Guy drops music video for rap song ‘Chubby Sexy’ Friday 7:33 PM
- A ‘Black Mirror’-inspired miniseries is coming to YouTube via Netflix Latin America Friday 5:56 PM
- Kanye West appears on David Letterman’s Netflix show to talk Trump, TMZ, and Drake Friday 3:27 PM
- QAnon believers link small-town arrest to deep state conspiracy without evidence Friday 1:58 PM
- Instagram photos showing prison conditions spark massive protest Friday 1:33 PM
- ‘Gay rat wedding’ headline sparks amazing new meme Friday 1:03 PM
- ‘I read a gossip piece’ meme mocks Moby’s Instagram post Friday 12:39 PM
- Rotten Tomatoes wants to see your ticket stub to leave a verified review Friday 11:46 AM
- ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ movie delayed to 2020 to fix his look Friday 11:39 AM
Republicans reveal bill to preempt the FCC’s new net neutrality rules
An interesting confrontation lies ahead.
Congressional Republicans on Friday released the text of a net neutrality bill intended to forestall an FCC vote on the issue, setting up yet another confrontation with an administration intent on regulatory action.
The bill says that Internet service providers (ISPs) “may not block lawful content, applications, or services, subject to reasonable network management.” The phrase “network management” is defined only loosely later in the bill, making it a potential loophole that Internet freedom advocates are likely to decry.
The same network-management exemption appears in two other provisions of the bill, including the ban on throttling traffic “by selectively slowing, speeding, degrading, or enhancing Internet traffic based on source, destination, or content.”
On Thursday, the White House said that legislative action on net neutrality was not needed.
“We don’t believe it’s necessary given that the FCC has the authorities that it needs under Title II,” an administration official said an in interview with Reuters. Title II refers to a section of the Communications Act that net neutrality advocates believe is the best way to ensure all data on the Internet is treated equally.
The Republicans who drafted the bill responded to Obama in a press release, saying that their legislation would prevent “lengthy court battles that would surely come from the FCC’s proposed action, bringing certainty to consumers and job creators alike for years to come.”
“By turning the FCC away from a heavy-handed and messy approach to regulating the Internet,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, “this draft protects both consumers who rely on Internet services and innovators who create jobs.”
The Republicans’ bill calls for an end to paid prioritization, in which companies pay Internet service providers (ISPs) to deliver their content faster than non-paying competitors. The present legality of the practice has led companies like Netflix to strike prioritization deals with service providers, although they have pleaded with the FCC to ban the practice.
Another striking component of the Republicans’ bill is the section outlining how the FCC can implement and oversee the bill’s substantive provisions. “The Commission,” it says, “may not expand the Internet openness obligations for provision of broadband Internet access service beyond the obligations established” in the bill.
The third section of the bill allows ISPs to ignore the net neutrality restrictions if doing so is necessary to “address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities.”
Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the House Communications and Technology Subcommittee, emphasized the principle of regulatory certainty in dismissing the administration’s push for FCC action.
“By acting legislatively,” Rep. Walden said in a statement, “we are putting forward a fresh, sustainable solution that accomplishes the goals we all share, without the needless trips to court that would jeopardize these core principles.”
Both chambers of Congress will consider the bill during their net neutrality hearings on Wednesday, Jan 21.
The entire bill can be read below.
Illustration by Jason Reed
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.