- Lizzo reps Beyoncé’s Ivy Park collection in controversial TikTok 5 Years Ago
- Netflix’s ‘Eye for an Eye’ is a fun but messy thriller about revenge 5 Years Ago
- Which 2020 Democratic candidates post the most cringe? Today 6:30 AM
- The new ‘Hunger Games’ book paints President Snow as a hero—and people are not happy Tuesday 9:03 PM
- Influencer called out for ‘troubling image’ with Kenyan child Tuesday 8:18 PM
- Professor arrested for spending $185K of grant money on iTunes and strippers Tuesday 7:28 PM
- Man cuts his books in half to make them ‘portable,’ spurs online debate Tuesday 6:09 PM
- Fans defend Lana Del Rey after she was mocked for flying commercial Tuesday 5:10 PM
- Lady Gaga fans find alleged new song name in her website’s code Tuesday 4:42 PM
- Barstool Sports deletes anti-union tweets, blog post in settlement Tuesday 3:47 PM
- The ‘can have … as a treat’ meme has come full circle Tuesday 3:09 PM
- Joe Rogan says he’s voting for Bernie Sanders Tuesday 2:54 PM
- Woman spots mole in man’s TikTok video, saves him from cancer Tuesday 2:17 PM
- ‘You’ star confirms his character is queer and ‘never will be’ straight Tuesday 1:08 PM
- This Twitch streamer pooped his pants during a broadcast Tuesday 12:17 PM
Turns out Snapchat isn’t just an app for keeping tabs on thirsty randos, recording evidence of your own criminal psychopathy, and distributing nudes to hacker networks. It can also be used as a mildly awkward platform for interviewing sitting members of Congress in a way that makes them almost palatable to a millennial audience that has no interest in their politics.
This seems to be the thrust of CNN’s “historic” softball Snapchat interview with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), which covered his undefined 2016 presidential ambitions and set him up for a gratuitous Hillary Clinton burn of which you could tell he was really proud. The most memorable answer that the longtime Snapchat user gave, however, related to the drunk government intelligence officer who crashed a drone on the White House lawn on Monday.
“Drones should only be used according to the Constitution,” Rand said, perhaps unaware that his favorite 227-year-old document in no way refers to remotely controlled aircraft. “But if they fly over my house, they better beware, because I’ve got a shotgun.”
Here at the Daily Dot, we started wondering: Just how legal it is to shoot down nosy drones hovering above (or near) one’s property? We’ll let you know what the experts tell us, but until then, guess it’s open season.
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'