- Why Britons are tweeting ‘Little England’ in wake of the U.K. election Today 3:22 PM
- Net neutrality advocates ask for rehearing on federal court decision Today 2:29 PM
- Americans are sharing their #PrivateHealthLIFEhacks to help Brits Today 2:28 PM
- Warren, Sanders, Yang pledge to skip next week’s debate over union dispute Today 2:12 PM
- How to watch tonight’s Nets vs. Raptors matchup on NBA TV Today 2:00 PM
- Alt-right comedian Owen Benjamin banned from Instagram over anti-Semitic memes Today 1:55 PM
- TikTok teens are procrastinating with #FinalsWeek Today 1:46 PM
- ‘The Mandalorian’ takes on a prison break in episode 6 Today 1:30 PM
- Nick Cannon vs. Eminem battle expected to escalate after ‘off-limits’ daughter diss Today 12:50 PM
- Laura Loomer vehemently denies being author of new Laura Loomer-themed action novel Today 12:30 PM
- PewDiePie’s poop-inspired game gets banned by Apple Today 11:29 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ showrunners to adapt ‘Lovecraft’ graphic novel to screen Today 11:00 AM
- The 50 memes that defined the decade Today 10:45 AM
- Venmo users are getting harassed with fraudulent payment requests Today 10:38 AM
- Twitter pledges to verify politicians in national primaries Today 9:34 AM
Paul, according to the Washington Post, stalled an attempt by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s (D-N.Y.) to have the bill approved by unanimous consent, believing that the costs associated with it should be offset elsewhere. A spokesperson for the senator told the news outlet that he wanted to add a provision to the bill to help pay for it.
“It’s absolutely outrageous, and you’ll pardon me if I’m not impressed in any way by Rand Paul’s fiscal responsibility virtue signaling,” he said, later adding: “Now he stands up at the last minute, after 15 years of blood sweat and tears from the 9/11 community to say that it’s all over now. Now we’re going to balance the budget on the backs of the 9/11 first responder community… This is about what kind of society we have, at some point we have to stand up for the people who have always stood up for us.”
Last month, Stewart gave emotional testimony during a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing about the fund and blasted members of Congress for not attending the hearing.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, Paul said that he was not “blocking” the bill, but rather “asking for a vote on an amendment to offset the cost.”
Not blocking the 9/11 bill - simply asking for a vote on an amendment to offset the cost.— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 17, 2019
The explanation was not met well by people online.
So you're blocking the 9/11 First Responders bill until we cut spending to health care or education. Right? Shameful @RandPaul. You were fine with cutting taxes for millionaires, but taking care of these heroes is too much? Despicable. https://t.co/JgZz0oYWLo— Liuba Grechen Shirley (@liuba4congress) July 17, 2019
Let's get rid of your salary and tax payer benefits because it costs too much. https://t.co/jDNDURnsZW— Ken Lingenfelter (@kenl5502) July 17, 2019
If you cared as much about 9/11 first responders as you did about your wealthy donors and corporations, you'd pass the bill right now.— Robert Reich (@RBReich) July 17, 2019
These are firefighters and police officers fighting for their lives. Do your job. https://t.co/TRhkyLC26E
As of Friday morning, Paul’s tweet had more than 17 thousand replies compared to just 2,400 retweets and 9,400 likes.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).