- Gigi Hadid absolutely obliterates Jake Paul over Zayn Malik diss 2 Years Ago
- People really want Chris Matthews fired after he compared Sanders’ Nevada win to Nazi invasion of France Today 9:35 AM
- Bernie Sanders wins Nevada Caucuses Saturday 6:54 PM
- MSNBC is out of its mind over Sanders leading Nevada Saturday 5:20 PM
- Kim Kardashian dragged for using makeup to darken her hands Saturday 4:13 PM
- TikTok users show how they turned their vehicles into incredible tiny homes Saturday 3:44 PM
- Woman iconically pranks man who sent her an unsolicited d*ck pic Saturday 2:25 PM
- ‘Terrifying’ deepfake puts Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk in ‘Star Trek’ Saturday 1:06 PM
- A 36-year-old called the cops after being booted from parents’ phone plan Saturday 12:16 PM
- People think novelist Dean Koontz predicted the coronavirus in 1981 thriller Saturday 10:22 AM
- Twitter suspends 70 pro-Bloomberg accounts Saturday 9:15 AM
- In documentary ‘Modern Whore,’ a former escort takes control of her own narrative Saturday 6:30 AM
- Cara Delevingne calls out Justin Bieber for ‘ranking’ wife Hailey’s friends Friday 9:07 PM
- Fans defend Jenna Marbles after some people claimed she mistreated her dogs in a recent video Friday 8:37 PM
- ‘Friends’ gets reunion special on HBO Max, fans go wild Friday 7:37 PM
Political polls can bring out some passionate reactions in people. But sometimes even the pollsters can’t help themselves.
On Wednesday, Public Policy Polling (PPP) laid into a critic named Susan who complained that its poll’s sample size wasn’t large enough to provide an accurate representation of the American electorate.
I am sorry that we didn't poll all 63 million Trump voters SUSAN https://t.co/nMmN7Edwwp— PublicPolicyPolling (@ppppolls) November 1, 2017
“SUSAN,” as PPP put it, was responding to a tweet from Amy Siskind, founder of women’s advocacy group the New Agenda and a high-profile supporter of Hillary Clinton who shared a story about public support for impeaching President Donald Trump.
"survey of 572 registered voters" This is a sample of 63 million voters who support Trump? What a crock of shit.— SUSAN (@Sue4the5) November 1, 2017
As Siskind points out, the PPP poll in question finds a new level of support for impeaching Trump. And, indeed, the pollster did talk to just 572 registered voters, according to the methodology laid out in the poll. According to the National Council on Public Polling (NCPP), an association of pollsters that monitors polling quality and standards, the average sample size for public polls of this nature is around 1,000 people, so this PPP poll does have a relatively low sample size.
That said, PPP is a mid-tier pollster, according to FiveThirtyEight, which gives the organization a B+ in terms of its overall quality. Regardless of the sample size, people on Twitter loved PPP’s all-caps sass.
tfw statisticians have had enough with your lack of numerical fluency https://t.co/Q73DN0hsDg— Jodi Beggs (@jodiecongirl) November 1, 2017
(Oh) Snap poll? 🧐 https://t.co/jjyX5rF0j7— Celeste Katz Marston (@CelesteKatzNYC) November 1, 2017
When you get owned on twitter dot com by a pollster. https://t.co/hVOM6B4M4m— Ken Norton (@kennethn) November 1, 2017
While PPP’s sarcasm in its response to a random critic is unique, the pollster is known for embracing a more controversial public image. During the 2016 election, for example, PPP asked voters to rate political candidates against Harambe, the dead gorilla turned meme, and Deez Nuts, a kid who registered as an independent presidential candidate.
Given all that, Susan probably should have seen this one coming.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.