- How to stream live TV on PlayStation 4 4 Years Ago
- How to watch Disney XD online for free 4 Years Ago
- Who survived the ‘Game of Thrones’ series finale? Sunday 10:21 PM
- Justin Bieber fans are damaging one of Iceland’s top tourist spots Sunday 1:28 PM
- James Charles drops 41-minute response video to Tati Westbrook’s accusations Sunday 1:15 PM
- Watch what happens when this Twitch streamer quits his job on camera Sunday 12:25 PM
- Men are finally sharing their abortion stories Sunday 10:58 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Maria’ is a trigger-happy B-movie Sunday 9:07 AM
- How to stream Money in the Bank 2019 for free Sunday 9:00 AM
- How to watch ‘Game of Thrones’ season 8, episode 6 for free Sunday 8:00 AM
- These ‘Game of Thrones’ houses are gone forever Sunday 7:54 AM
- The 10 best anime movies on Hulu Sunday 7:00 AM
- Vibe TV puts a premium price tag on piracy Sunday 6:00 AM
- Twitter unites in collective confusion over ‘Democrats for Trump’ trending Saturday 2:28 PM
- YouTube star tweets and deletes video of his Black cousin ‘Peanut’ acting as a stool Saturday 1:04 PM
Politwoops preserves its 1.1 million tweets with the Internet Archive
The duplicity of politicians endureth forever.
The Sunlight Foundation/Open State project to net deleted tweets by politicians and diplomats in more than 30 countries around the world ended when Twitter revoked the foundation’s access to the company’s API.
But now “1,106,187 deleted tweets by 10,404 politicians collected in 35 countries and parliaments over a period of five years” will reside forever in the stacks of the Internet’s primary library, according to an announcement on Wednesday.
Twitter’s decision was countered by a massive open letter this month from 17 human rights groups, requesting that Twitter reconsider the suspension. Signatories included the American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Nigeria’s Paradigm Initiative, and Mexico’s Sursiendo. Fifty additional groups subsequently endorsed it.
In response to Twitter’s assertion that it cut off access because of privacy rights, the writers responded that the courts have not agreed that politicians have the same rights as private individuals when they carry a large load of public trust.
“Twitter’s reasoning conflates transparency and accountability with privacy. We agree that when users decide to delete tweets they are engaging in expression—but add that the public has a compelling interest in the expression of public officials. Recognizing this public interest, courts have long held that public officials do not receive the same treatment for privacy. Further, when public officials use Twitter to amplify their political views, they invite greater scrutiny of their expression. Journalists and civil society utilize tools like Politwoops to understand the views and commitments of the people these politicians represent—and the politician or candidate’s own intents and perspective. In this case, the citizen’s right to freedom of expression —which includes access to information—outweighs the official’s right to a retroactive edit.”
Should this decision stick, at least the Politwoops tweets residing on the Internet Archive will remain as a resource for voters, journalists, scholars, and activists.
H/T Engadget | Illustration by Max Fleishman | Remix by Fernando Alfonso III
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers