- Cardi B says she drugged, robbed men in her past on Instagram Live Monday 8:03 PM
- Twitter thread roasts bathtub tray ads for women Monday 7:21 PM
- Nintendo set to release two new models of the Switch—possibly in 2019 Monday 6:45 PM
- Viral cat video ‘Dear Kitten’ finds new life in TikTok challenge Monday 5:30 PM
- Here’s every show that was announced at the Apple TV+ kickoff Monday 3:53 PM
- ‘Shazam!’ embraces the spectacle and heart of the superhero genre Monday 3:45 PM
- How to mute Twitter’s suggested tweets on your timeline Monday 3:02 PM
- What you need to know about Apple’s new streaming service Monday 2:32 PM
- Text-message fanfiction is taking over Instagram Monday 1:54 PM
- Your Asus computer might have a secret backdoor Monday 1:06 PM
- Trump is already fundraising off the Mueller report—even though no one’s seen it Monday 1:01 PM
- Michael Avenatti charged with trying to extort $20 million from Nike Monday 12:51 PM
- Logan Paul says being a YouTuber is ‘wack’ Monday 12:14 PM
- James Comey posts from a forest in wake of Mueller report Monday 10:35 AM
- These are the only online dating sites worth your time Monday 10:29 AM
Politwoops preserves its 1.1 million tweets with the Internet Archive
The duplicity of politicians endureth forever.
The Sunlight Foundation/Open State project to net deleted tweets by politicians and diplomats in more than 30 countries around the world ended when Twitter revoked the foundation’s access to the company’s API.
But now “1,106,187 deleted tweets by 10,404 politicians collected in 35 countries and parliaments over a period of five years” will reside forever in the stacks of the Internet’s primary library, according to an announcement on Wednesday.
Twitter’s decision was countered by a massive open letter this month from 17 human rights groups, requesting that Twitter reconsider the suspension. Signatories included the American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Nigeria’s Paradigm Initiative, and Mexico’s Sursiendo. Fifty additional groups subsequently endorsed it.
In response to Twitter’s assertion that it cut off access because of privacy rights, the writers responded that the courts have not agreed that politicians have the same rights as private individuals when they carry a large load of public trust.
“Twitter’s reasoning conflates transparency and accountability with privacy. We agree that when users decide to delete tweets they are engaging in expression—but add that the public has a compelling interest in the expression of public officials. Recognizing this public interest, courts have long held that public officials do not receive the same treatment for privacy. Further, when public officials use Twitter to amplify their political views, they invite greater scrutiny of their expression. Journalists and civil society utilize tools like Politwoops to understand the views and commitments of the people these politicians represent—and the politician or candidate’s own intents and perspective. In this case, the citizen’s right to freedom of expression —which includes access to information—outweighs the official’s right to a retroactive edit.”
Should this decision stick, at least the Politwoops tweets residing on the Internet Archive will remain as a resource for voters, journalists, scholars, and activists.
H/T Engadget | Illustration by Max Fleishman | Remix by Fernando Alfonso III
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers