- How to watch Pacquiao vs. Broner online Today 9:00 AM
- What does IMO mean? Today 8:00 AM
- ‘Trigger Warning with Killer Mike’ digs into America’s wounds with a wink and a black flag Today 7:00 AM
- How to watch Tigres vs. Cruz Azul online for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to watch Arsenal vs. Chelsea online for free Today 5:21 AM
- How to watch Borussia Dortmund vs. RB Leipzig online for free Today 5:07 AM
- How to watch Real Madrid vs. Sevilla online for free Today 4:48 AM
- Netflix says ‘Fortnite’ is more competition than HBO Friday 8:25 PM
- This computer-generated Insta model looks staggeringly real Friday 7:15 PM
- Netflix is bringing back ‘Unsolved Mysteries’ with ‘Stranger Things’ producer Friday 6:42 PM
- Facebook is creating a meme feature to bring back the teens Friday 4:13 PM
- A hitman’s smartwatch helped send him to prison for life Friday 4:05 PM
- Privacy group files complaints against Netlifx, Spotify for GDPR violations Friday 3:02 PM
- Bikini Kill reunion show sale proves the internet is still hell for live music fans Friday 2:55 PM
- Teen’s photo of Nazi-themed school-dance invite goes viral Friday 2:31 PM
Why did USA Today run a Charlie Hebdo op-ed by an extremist?
Anjem Choudary does not speak for all Muslims.
Where some see tragedy, others see a great public relations opportunity.
One day after the deadly attacks on Charlie Hebdo’s offices in Paris, U.K.-based Islamist cleric Anjem Choudary wrote a 300 word op-ed in USA Today, America’s most widely read newspaper, that blamed France, the cartoonists, and the West for the murders that took place.
He asked “why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?”
“It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world’s population was protected,” he argued.
Choudary—who has praised September 11 attacks, London Tube bombings, and Madrid train bombings—knows exactly how and when to get the most attention: before the blood has dried.
When USA Today and Fox News bring Choudary their spotlights, it’s important to note—and neither of them did—that Choudary is a blowhard extremist. He is not your Muslim neighbor. He is not your Muslim schoolmate. He does not represent all Muslims.
Choudary too often gets a microphone as though he does represent all Muslims, however, and many other Muslims are furious about it.
Contrast Choudary’s trolling with the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) response to the attack on Charlie Hebdo:
“We strongly condemn this brutal and cowardly attack and reiterate our repudiation of any such assault on freedom of speech, even speech that mocks faiths and religious figures. The proper response to such attacks on the freedoms we hold dear is not to vilify any faith, but instead to marginalize extremists of all backgrounds who seek to stifle freedom and to create or widen societal divisions.
“We offer sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of those killed or injured in this attack. We also call for the swift apprehension of the perpetrators, who should be punished to the full extent of the law.”
Notice a difference?
There’s room for debate on absolutely anything, of course. Thanks to the Western culture of free speech that Choudary so badly resents, even bile like Choudary’s voice can be heard. But instead of telling their readers where Choudary stands in the Muslim world—he’s a controversial hypocrite on the fringe of the Western-Muslim society and the focus of much Islamic criticism—USA Today allows him to portray himself as the voice of all Muslims.
Screenshot via Sean Hannity/Fox News
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.