- 2020 Democrats refuse to answer our questions about ‘Cats’ Today 4:14 PM
- Belle Delphine’s Instagram account removed after mass reporting campaign Today 4:08 PM
- Mariah Carey refuses old-age FaceApp challenge Today 3:19 PM
- Journalists horrified by consolidation of Gatehouse, Gannett Today 3:12 PM
- Facebook and Google could be tracking you on porn sites Today 1:42 PM
- 7 best sites for psychic love readings Today 1:20 PM
- Driver demonstrates why you always need to read road signs Today 12:58 PM
- Area 51 remix video proves it’s the summer of Lil Nas X Today 12:26 PM
- ‘ICE will come’: Convenience store clerk threatens customers speaking Spanish Today 12:11 PM
- Rand Paul dodges questions about 9/11 Victims Fund, says ‘watch Fox News’ Today 11:51 AM
- Report: ‘Stranger Things’ season 4 to begin shooting in October Today 11:03 AM
- AT&T paid Michael Cohen to consult on net neutrality, FBI documents show Today 9:10 AM
- Mysterio’s ruse changes on a second viewing of ‘Far From Home’ Today 9:06 AM
- Twitter overturns Barrett Brown’s third permanent suspension Today 8:49 AM
- How to live stream Liga MX Today 7:56 AM
Why did USA Today run a Charlie Hebdo op-ed by an extremist?
Anjem Choudary does not speak for all Muslims.
Where some see tragedy, others see a great public relations opportunity.
One day after the deadly attacks on Charlie Hebdo’s offices in Paris, U.K.-based Islamist cleric Anjem Choudary wrote a 300 word op-ed in USA Today, America’s most widely read newspaper, that blamed France, the cartoonists, and the West for the murders that took place.
He asked “why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?”
“It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world’s population was protected,” he argued.
Choudary—who has praised September 11 attacks, London Tube bombings, and Madrid train bombings—knows exactly how and when to get the most attention: before the blood has dried.
When USA Today and Fox News bring Choudary their spotlights, it’s important to note—and neither of them did—that Choudary is a blowhard extremist. He is not your Muslim neighbor. He is not your Muslim schoolmate. He does not represent all Muslims.
Choudary too often gets a microphone as though he does represent all Muslims, however, and many other Muslims are furious about it.
Contrast Choudary’s trolling with the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) response to the attack on Charlie Hebdo:
“We strongly condemn this brutal and cowardly attack and reiterate our repudiation of any such assault on freedom of speech, even speech that mocks faiths and religious figures. The proper response to such attacks on the freedoms we hold dear is not to vilify any faith, but instead to marginalize extremists of all backgrounds who seek to stifle freedom and to create or widen societal divisions.
“We offer sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of those killed or injured in this attack. We also call for the swift apprehension of the perpetrators, who should be punished to the full extent of the law.”
Notice a difference?
There’s room for debate on absolutely anything, of course. Thanks to the Western culture of free speech that Choudary so badly resents, even bile like Choudary’s voice can be heard. But instead of telling their readers where Choudary stands in the Muslim world—he’s a controversial hypocrite on the fringe of the Western-Muslim society and the focus of much Islamic criticism—USA Today allows him to portray himself as the voice of all Muslims.
Screenshot via Sean Hannity/Fox News
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.