- People think novelist Dean Koontz predicted the coronavirus in 1981 thriller 5 Years Ago
- Twitter suspends 70 pro-Bloomberg accounts Today 9:15 AM
- In documentary ‘Modern Whore,’ a former escort takes control of her own narrative Today 6:30 AM
- Cara Delevingne calls out Justin Bieber for ‘ranking’ wife Hailey’s friends Friday 9:07 PM
- Fans defend Jenna Marbles after some people claimed she mistreated her dogs in a recent video Friday 8:37 PM
- ‘Friends’ gets reunion special on HBO Max, fans go wild Friday 7:37 PM
- Why you should drop everything and start reading ‘Lore Olympus’ Friday 6:27 PM
- ‘Boogaloo’ memes are trying to organize a second civil war—and they’re spreading fast Friday 3:48 PM
- People are disturbed by these McDonald’s-scented candles Friday 3:47 PM
- Season 2 of ‘The Witcher’ is in production Friday 3:16 PM
- Here are some cringey billboards Bloomberg ran in Arizona Friday 2:51 PM
- PewDiePie returns to YouTube after 37-day hiatus Friday 2:01 PM
- Why was a Republican Party Facebook page co-managed by someone in Turkmenistan? Friday 1:26 PM
- The shorthand guide to ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ Friday 1:07 PM
- Congress urges Tinder to screen for sex offenders Friday 1:03 PM
The dangers of naming a star ‘Putin Is a D**khead’
Russian trolls have no sense of humor.
In 2008, research scientist Travis Metcalfe launched the Pale Blue Dot Project that allowed anyone to adopt a star for $10. All proceeds go to astronomy research. The low costs that undercut for-profit competitors brought significant attention.
It took a few years until things really exploded.
In 2014, while fighting raged in Ukraine, some politically active Ukrainian astronomers adopted a star and decided to call it “Putin Is a Dickhead.”
In a new research paper outlining the project’s lifespan, Metcalfe explained exactly what happened next.
“A political group in Ukraine had adopted a star under the controversial name through [a reseller],” Metcalfe wrote, “and then began publicizing it through social media in late June 2014. By early July, the insult had gone viral, with an image of the Ukrainian ‘Certificate of Adoption’ guiding supporters to the Pale Blue Dot Project.”
The newly politicized star made headlines around the world, including right in Moscow.
“On the morning of July 4, I received a telephone call from a reporter at the Moscow Times asking for comment.,” Metcalfe explained. “I told him ‘Free speech is now written in the stars. We have no plans to censor any of these star adoptions. We appreciate the support for science.'”
If you’ve read anything about the notorious Russian trolls that proliferate through the English-language Internet, what happened next might not be much of a surprise.
“Several patriotic Russians were disappointed with our decision, and made personal threats against me,” Metcalfe wrote. “Who knew that crowdfunding for science could be so dangerous?”
Before he ever experienced a virtual run-in with Putin supporters, Metcalfe met with another enemy: Carl Sagan’s lawyers.
Pale Blue Dot is the name of Sagan’s famous 1994 book on the future of human space travel. In 2009, Metcalfe received a cease and desist letter from Sagan’s lawyers demanding an end to the use of his copyright.
It took a month of work from a lawyer for Metcalfe to rid himself of the “bogus claim to the phrase.”
Read the full paper here:
Photo via ESO/Wikipedia (CC BY 4.0)
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.