- Harness the power of sun: The best solar-powered phone charges 7 Months Ago
- Majority of threats made since El Paso and Dayton shootings have been made online Thursday 8:00 PM
- Miley Cyrus tweets about cheating allegations and penis cake drama Thursday 6:32 PM
- ‘The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance’ dazzles with a timely tale Thursday 6:00 PM
- The DOJ emailed a white nationalist blog post to immigration judges Thursday 5:31 PM
- The Amazon rainforest is on fire–and people are using memes to cope Thursday 4:11 PM
- Microsoft contractors listened in on Xbox users Thursday 2:15 PM
- Anti-vaxxer assaults pro-vaccine lawmaker on Facebook Live (updated) Thursday 2:15 PM
- Oreos licked by singer Lewis Capaldi are being auctioned off on eBay Thursday 1:54 PM
- Zach Braff predicted Sean Spicer would be on ‘Dancing With the Stars’ 2 years ago Thursday 1:38 PM
- NYPD sergeant who watched Eric Garner die punished with lost vacation days Thursday 1:27 PM
- Brie Larson haters have a meltdown over a joke about Thor’s hammer Thursday 1:26 PM
- This comedian attempted to make fun of women on Twitter—and it did not go over well Thursday 1:04 PM
- Logan Paul wants to help the Amazon rainforest Thursday 12:36 PM
- Nutaku announces redesign and filters for LGBTQ porn games (updated) Thursday 12:25 PM
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) decided to play a “game” during a congressional hearing earlier this week to illustrate ethical problems in politics.
Ocasio-Cortez made the remarks during a House Oversight and Government Reform committee. She started by asking the panel testifying to play a “lightning round game” where she would act as a “bad guy” who wants to enrich themselves and run for political office.
The newly-sworn in congresswoman peppered a panel of experts with questions about a “bad guy” running for office whose campaign was funded by “100 percent lobbyist PAC” money. The persona also wanted to use campaign funds to cover up “some skeletons in my closet.” After every question, the panel would agree that her hypothetical situations were legal.
After that, Ocasio-Cortez hit home with the substance of her questions:
“So I use my special interest dark money funded campaign to pay off folks that I need to pay off and get elected. So now I’m elected, now I’m in. I’ve got the power to draft, lobby, and shape the laws that govern the United States of America. Fabulous… Is there any hard limit that I have, in terms of what legislation I’m allowed to touch? Are there any limits on the laws I can write, or influence… based on the special interest funds that I accepted to finance my campaign and get me elected in the first place?”
“There is no limit,” one panelist answered.
Ocasio-Cortez later pivoted, asking if there was anything preventing the “bad guy” persona from having stocks in the industries that donated to the hypothetical campaign and writing laws that would benefit them financially. The answer was no.
Finally, the New York lawmaker asked the entire panel if “any elements” she mentioned in her hypothetical situation applied to the U.S. government. Several panelists said they did.
“So we have a system that is fundamentally broken,” she said. “We have these influences existing in this body. Which means that these influences are here in this committee, shaping the questions that are being asked of you all right now.”
She ended by comparing the ethics rules and accountability in Congress and for the president—to which one panelist answered: “There’s almost no laws at all that apply to the president.”
“It’s already super legal, as we’ve seen, for me to be a pretty bad guy, so it’s even easier for the president of the United States to be one, I’d assume?” she said as her time expired.
You can watch all of the exchange on C-SPAN here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).