- Gabrielle Union deserves better from Terry Crews Tuesday 11:12 PM
- T.I. publicly apologizes to daughters after Kobe Bryant’s death Tuesday 8:46 PM
- ‘Squash the boss’: Labor union seemingly unknowingly posted furry fetish art Tuesday 8:04 PM
- TikTok user pretending to be lab technician who has contracted coronavirus Tuesday 7:08 PM
- Caroline Calloway says she plans to campaign for Bernie Sanders Tuesday 6:23 PM
- Justin Bieber, Snoop Dogg, millions of others sign petition to make Kobe Bryant new NBA logo Tuesday 5:39 PM
- No, Lana Del Rey did not cry because Billie Eilish won album of the year Tuesday 4:48 PM
- People are exposing their eyeballs to phone flash for this TikTok challenge Tuesday 3:55 PM
- Watch Mike Bloomberg try to shake a dog’s mouth Tuesday 3:41 PM
- ‘Rey who?’ is the funniest meme to emerge from ‘The Rise of Skywalker’ Tuesday 3:30 PM
- AI beat the CDC to the punch on coronavirus warnings Tuesday 3:21 PM
- What exactly is a ‘large boulder the size of a small boulder’? Tuesday 2:49 PM
- Mom of ‘Success Kid’ says Steve King can’t use her son’s meme for ‘repulsive’ campaign Tuesday 2:00 PM
- Jake Paul can’t escape Logan Paul’s shadow—even if that loyalty has hurt his career Tuesday 1:13 PM
- Kobe Bryant’s Oscar-winning ‘Dear Basketball’ is now available to stream for free (updated) Tuesday 12:21 PM
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) decided to play a “game” during a congressional hearing earlier this week to illustrate ethical problems in politics.
Ocasio-Cortez made the remarks during a House Oversight and Government Reform committee. She started by asking the panel testifying to play a “lightning round game” where she would act as a “bad guy” who wants to enrich themselves and run for political office.
The newly-sworn in congresswoman peppered a panel of experts with questions about a “bad guy” running for office whose campaign was funded by “100 percent lobbyist PAC” money. The persona also wanted to use campaign funds to cover up “some skeletons in my closet.” After every question, the panel would agree that her hypothetical situations were legal.
After that, Ocasio-Cortez hit home with the substance of her questions:
“So I use my special interest dark money funded campaign to pay off folks that I need to pay off and get elected. So now I’m elected, now I’m in. I’ve got the power to draft, lobby, and shape the laws that govern the United States of America. Fabulous… Is there any hard limit that I have, in terms of what legislation I’m allowed to touch? Are there any limits on the laws I can write, or influence… based on the special interest funds that I accepted to finance my campaign and get me elected in the first place?”
“There is no limit,” one panelist answered.
Ocasio-Cortez later pivoted, asking if there was anything preventing the “bad guy” persona from having stocks in the industries that donated to the hypothetical campaign and writing laws that would benefit them financially. The answer was no.
Finally, the New York lawmaker asked the entire panel if “any elements” she mentioned in her hypothetical situation applied to the U.S. government. Several panelists said they did.
“So we have a system that is fundamentally broken,” she said. “We have these influences existing in this body. Which means that these influences are here in this committee, shaping the questions that are being asked of you all right now.”
She ended by comparing the ethics rules and accountability in Congress and for the president—to which one panelist answered: “There’s almost no laws at all that apply to the president.”
“It’s already super legal, as we’ve seen, for me to be a pretty bad guy, so it’s even easier for the president of the United States to be one, I’d assume?” she said as her time expired.
You can watch all of the exchange on C-SPAN here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).