- Woman documents how airport staff broke her wheelchair 3 Years Ago
- Funeral home allegedly posted photos of woman’s dead body on social media Today 1:56 PM
- Alinity Divine is being investigated after throwing her cat during stream Today 12:04 PM
- ‘Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee’ returns with Seinfeld making a racist joke about China Today 10:26 AM
- YouTubers Eugenia Cooney and Shane Dawson make a joint comeback Today 9:06 AM
- The crushing effects of Trump’s abortion ‘gag rule’ on healthcare Today 8:00 AM
- How to live stream Pacquiao vs. Thurman Today 6:20 AM
- Review: Hulu with Live TV ensures you always have something to watch Today 6:00 AM
- How to live stream UFC on ESPN 4: Rafael dos Anjos vs. Leon Edwards Today 5:49 AM
- 2020 Democrats refuse to answer our questions about ‘Cats’ Friday 4:14 PM
- Belle Delphine’s Instagram account removed after mass reporting campaign Friday 4:08 PM
- Mariah Carey refuses old-age FaceApp challenge Friday 3:19 PM
- Journalists horrified by consolidation of Gatehouse, Gannett Friday 3:12 PM
- Facebook and Google could be tracking you on porn sites Friday 1:42 PM
- 7 best sites for psychic love readings Friday 1:20 PM
The details on Yahoo’s reported scanning of users’ emails remain murky.
One day after a report claimed that Yahoo scanned users’ emails on behalf of U.S. intelligence agencies, the head of the NSA argued that getting a blanket look at hundreds of millions of Americans’ emails “would be illegal.”
“I’ve read this real quickly, and I thought, well, this is a little speculative,” Adm. Michael Rogers said at the Cambridge Cyber Summit on Wednesday.
Yahoo called the report “misleading” in a short and vague denial to reporters.
“We narrowly interpret every government request for user data to minimize disclosure,” a Yahoo spokesperson wrote. “The mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems.”
There’s no telling what exactly that means, but, due to the lack of a strong denial, it’s reasonable to guess that some kind of scanning system does exist.
Since the report emerged a day ago, journalists and technologists have been hypothesizing about the specific nature of what’s been going on at Yahoo.
Robert Graham, at Errata Security, emphatically pointed out that the Reuters article lacked crucial details about how the scanning worked. Actually, he called the whole report garbage.
Well? Which is it? Did they “search incoming emails” or did they “scan mail accounts”? Whether we are dealing with emails in transmit, or stored on the servers, is a BFD (Big Fucking Detail) that you can’t gloss over and confuse in a story like this. Whether searches are done indiscriminately across all emails, or only for specific accounts, is another BFD.
Rogers, who heads both the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, argued that the U.S. does not engage in blanket domestic surveillance such as scanning all Yahoo emails.
“We don’t do that, and no court would ever grant us the authority to do that,” he said. “We have to make a specific case. And what the court grants is specific authority for a specific period of time for a specific purpose. It’s not a blanket, just everything.”
As usual, the details here are scant. But what is clear is that there is a whole lot more left to learn about exactly how much data the U.S. government gets from America’s biggest tech firms. Vague denials and secret court orders do little to educate the public on that front.
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.