- Barstool Sports deletes anti-union tweets, blog post in settlement 1 Year Ago
- The ‘can have … as a treat’ meme has come full circle 1 Year Ago
- Joe Rogan says he’s voting for Bernie Sanders Today 2:54 PM
- Woman spots mole in man’s TikTok video, saves him from cancer Today 2:17 PM
- ‘You’ star confirms his character is queer and ‘never will be’ straight Today 1:08 PM
- This Twitch streamer pooped his pants during a broadcast Today 12:17 PM
- Apple’s iCloud encryption plan halted amid FBI pressure, report Today 10:57 AM
- Glenn Greenwald charged with cybercrimes in Brazil Today 10:48 AM
- BadBunny rips her fans for not sending her enough money Today 10:06 AM
- White rapper punched in the face for saying the N-word during battle Today 9:21 AM
- Hillary Clinton blasts Bernie Sanders, says ‘nobody likes him’ Today 8:57 AM
- Someone found Harry Styles’ doppelganger—and TikTok is obsessed Today 8:08 AM
- Patrick Stewart has spoken to Kevin Feige about playing Professor X again Today 7:16 AM
- ‘Shrill’ season 2 expands its world and point of view Today 7:00 AM
- Trans/Sex: Let trans art be messy, weird, and uncomfortable Today 6:00 AM
Groups representing several major internet service providers (ISPs) sued Vermont on Thursday, accusing the state’s net neutrality law and executive order of unconstitutionally regulating broadband internet service.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Vermont, is similar to a lawsuit brought against California earlier this month after it passed what has been called the “gold standard” net neutrality law.
The plaintiffs of the lawsuit include: the American Cable Association, CTIA – The Wireless Association, NCTA – The Internet & Television Association, New England Cable & Telecommunications Association, and USTelecom – The Broadband Association. The groups represent ISPs such as AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon, according to Reuters.
Like the lawsuit brought against California, the most recent legal challenge alleges that Vermont’s net neutrality rules are preempted under the Constitution.
The suit brought by the telecom groups was not unexpected.
Gov. Phil Scott (R), who is named as a plaintiff in the suit, said released a statement ahead of the suit’s filing on Thursday and promised to “stand up” for net neutrality in court.
“I am disappointed to hear national telecom and cable organizations plan to sue us for taking action to protect our citizens and our economy,” Scott said in a statement. “While I understand consistent regulation is important to ensuring a vibrant and thriving telecom and cable sector, our obligation as a state government is to our citizens, who I strongly believe have a right to free and open access to information on the internet. In the absence of a national standard to protect that right, states must act. I am committed to working with the Attorney General’s Office to stand up for these rights in court.”
Scott signed an executive order that required state agencies to only use ISPs that do not throttle, block, or prioritize internet traffic, rules that were enshrined in the 2015 Open Internet Order, which was rescinded by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last year.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).