- Fortnite streamer Tfue sues gaming organization FaZe Clan over contract dispute Today 12:28 AM
- Report finds some users can’t opt out of Facebook’s face recognition Monday 7:27 PM
- Get emotional over this real-life pastor baptizing an anime girl in virtual reality Monday 6:53 PM
- Twitter wants to know what Jack in the Box did to offend Kim Kardashian Monday 6:38 PM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ meme claims King’s Landing is an ‘inside job’ Monday 6:06 PM
- Report: Personal data of 49 million Instagram influencers exposed online Monday 4:57 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ season 3 trailer teases a wet, hot American summer Monday 4:02 PM
- What Daenerys’ biggest ‘Game of Thrones’ scenes have in common with Nazi propaganda Monday 3:12 PM
- Here’s what’s coming to Amazon Prime in June Monday 2:11 PM
- Where did Jon Snow go? Unpacking the ‘Game of Thrones’ ending Monday 2:04 PM
- So, did anyone actually win ‘Game of Thrones’? Monday 1:29 PM
- The surprising religious subtext of ‘John Wick: Chapter 3’ Monday 12:53 PM
- Robin Arryn got hot—and the internet is seriously shook Monday 12:40 PM
- Tana Mongeau is going to VidCon a year after TanaCon disaster Monday 12:12 PM
- What have 2020 Democrats said about Alabama’s abortion ban? Monday 11:36 AM
FCC plan to kill net neutrality rules controversially shifts ISP policing to FTC
Here’s why that matters.
As part of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to gut net neutrality rules, the responsibility for policing internet regulations would shift to the FTC, a move that some critics believe is not an adequate enforcer of digital regulations.
Essentially, the Federal Communications Commission sets rules while the Federal Trade Commission enforces rules after wrongdoing has occurred, Bloomberg News reports. The move to the FTC would put internet regulations in a reactionary stance rather than a proactive one.
“It’s not adequate,” Gigi Sohn, who helped write net neutrality rules in 2015, told the news outlet. “If you wait for a case to be through, you can be out of business.”
The FCC has traditionally regulated industries such as telephone and broadcast companies, making it a logical home for internet regulation. The FTC, however, is more of a consumer protection agency that prevents unfair business practices.
Pai’s plan, which would reverse the 2015 Open Internet Order, has been criticized for endangering net neutrality, a founding principle of the internet that ensures all internet traffic is treated equally. For example, net neutrality rules bars internet service providers (ISPs) from slowing down Netflix in favor of its own streaming service or breaking the internet up into bundles—much like tiered cable television packages—that come with access to some websites but not others.
The new rules presented by Pai would reclassify broadband internet from a “common carrier” service, like landline telephone service, to a less restrictive classification under the Communications Act. Pai, an appointee of President Donald Trump, has long been in favor of scaling back the rules, much to the dismay of internet freedom proponents.
Pai’s proposal is expected to face a vote on Dec. 14 and will likely pass as the FCC has a three-member Republican majority. It is possible, if unlikely, that Congress could prevent the FCC from voting to overturn the 2015 Open Internet Order. If the proposal does pass, it will likely face immediate challenges in court.
You can read all of Bloomberg’s report here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).