- Trump’s handwritten ‘I WANT NOTHING’ note gets memed Today 12:57 PM
- Facebook quietly launched a meme generator app called Whale Today 12:40 PM
- How to watch tonight’s fire Warriors vs. Mavericks matchup online Today 12:14 PM
- Android security flaw could have let hackers hijack your phone’s camera Today 12:10 PM
- How Julia Roberts playing Harriet Tubman became a meme Today 12:01 PM
- Woman banned from Instagram for sharing d*ck pic she didn’t ask for (updated) Today 11:55 AM
- People risking concussions for new TikTok challenge Today 11:14 AM
- A ‘Joker’ sequel could be in the works from Warner Bros. (updated) Today 11:06 AM
- Is Jake Paul going to fight again? There are plenty of clues Today 10:57 AM
- Ghostemane concert abruptly canceled amid ‘safety concerns’ and reported gun threat Today 10:41 AM
- Trump Jr. retweets UFC fighter who called troop a ‘douche bag’ Today 10:26 AM
- The best apps and gadgets for cooking the perfect Thanksgiving feast Today 10:22 AM
- Amazon says police can hold on to Ring videos indefinitely Today 9:42 AM
- Henry Cavill on the prospect of playing Superman again: ‘the cape is still in the closet’ Today 9:15 AM
- Why does Pete Buttigieg always tweet ‘buh’? Today 9:08 AM
As part of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to gut net neutrality rules, the responsibility for policing internet regulations would shift to the FTC, a move that some critics believe is not an adequate enforcer of digital regulations.
Essentially, the Federal Communications Commission sets rules while the Federal Trade Commission enforces rules after wrongdoing has occurred, Bloomberg News reports. The move to the FTC would put internet regulations in a reactionary stance rather than a proactive one.
“It’s not adequate,” Gigi Sohn, who helped write net neutrality rules in 2015, told the news outlet. “If you wait for a case to be through, you can be out of business.”
The FCC has traditionally regulated industries such as telephone and broadcast companies, making it a logical home for internet regulation. The FTC, however, is more of a consumer protection agency that prevents unfair business practices.
Pai’s plan, which would reverse the 2015 Open Internet Order, has been criticized for endangering net neutrality, a founding principle of the internet that ensures all internet traffic is treated equally. For example, net neutrality rules bars internet service providers (ISPs) from slowing down Netflix in favor of its own streaming service or breaking the internet up into bundles—much like tiered cable television packages—that come with access to some websites but not others.
The new rules presented by Pai would reclassify broadband internet from a “common carrier” service, like landline telephone service, to a less restrictive classification under the Communications Act. Pai, an appointee of President Donald Trump, has long been in favor of scaling back the rules, much to the dismay of internet freedom proponents.
Pai’s proposal is expected to face a vote on Dec. 14 and will likely pass as the FCC has a three-member Republican majority. It is possible, if unlikely, that Congress could prevent the FCC from voting to overturn the 2015 Open Internet Order. If the proposal does pass, it will likely face immediate challenges in court.
You can read all of Bloomberg’s report here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).