- Anti-impeachment protesters aimlessly fumble through halls of Congress 1 Year Ago
- Everything we know so far about the Xbox Series X Today 12:17 PM
- ASMR YouTuber Life with MaK says she was branded a ‘Nazi’ by online smear campaign Today 10:46 AM
- Voters duped by fake ex-Bloomberg intern’s tweet about being fired Today 9:47 AM
- HBO’s ‘Watchmen’ and the fantasy of competence Today 8:00 AM
- Cómo ver Kamaru Usman vs. Colby Covington en el UFC 245 Today 7:00 AM
- ‘Penis fish’ memes erupt after worms wash up on California coast Friday 5:58 PM
- Why Britons are tweeting ‘Little England’ in wake of the U.K. election Friday 3:22 PM
- Net neutrality advocates ask for rehearing on federal court decision Friday 2:29 PM
- Americans are sharing their #PrivateHealthLIFEhacks to help Brits Friday 2:28 PM
- Warren, Sanders, Yang pledge to skip next week’s debate over union dispute Friday 2:12 PM
- How to watch tonight’s Nets vs. Raptors matchup on NBA TV Friday 2:00 PM
- Alt-right comedian Owen Benjamin banned from Instagram over anti-Semitic memes Friday 1:55 PM
- TikTok teens are procrastinating with #FinalsWeek Friday 1:46 PM
- ‘The Mandalorian’ takes on a prison break in episode 6 Friday 1:30 PM
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being sued by the New York Times for access to records surrounding the public comments submitted to the agency ahead of its controversial vote to repeal net neutrality protections last year.
The Times alleges in its complaint, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District on Thursday, that the records will “shed light on the extent to which Russian nationals and agents of the Russian government have interfered with the agency notice-and-comment process about a topic of extensive public interest: the government’s decision to abandon net neutrality.”
According to the complaint the FCC “has thrown up a series of roadblocks” as the Times has attempted to get the records—including web server logs—through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The FCC did not immediately respond to a request for comment by the Daily Dot.
Ahead of the vote, the comment system was flooded with comments both for and against the agency’s proposal to roll back the 2015 Open Internet Order and replace it with the Restoring Internet Freedom order.
In May 2017 the FCC said it was hit with a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS) shortly after Last Week Tonight host John Oliver asked his viewers to leave comments in support of net neutrality. However, last month FCC Chairman Ajit Pai admitted that the agency was never hit by a DDoS attack and blamed an employee for providing “inaccurate information.”
Lawmakers have also called on the FCC to investigate millions of fraudulent comments that were left on its website ahead of the net neutrality vote. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) sent a letter to the agency in May that claimed their identities were fraudulently used to comment ahead of the vote.
There were also reports of dead people’s names being used to leave comments.
In the complaint, the Times alleges that there were even more problems. A large portion of comments were “submitted by automation,” according to the complaint, and “some of these automated messages originated from Russia.”
In a separate case, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the FCC to hand over some data regarding the fake comments submitted ahead of the net neutrality vote.
TechDirt reports that the FCC will have to hand over email addresses that were used to submit CSV files and bulk comments. However, as the news outlet points out, the order does not require the FCC to hand over web server logs, similar to what the Times is seeking.
- For marginalized communities, net neutrality is about way more than Netflix
- Kavanaugh’s toxic net neutrality record went mostly unnoticed during hearings
- FCC’s Ajit Pai questions whether Google, Facebook, Twitter need more oversight
See the complaint here:
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).