- How to stream Cowboys vs Rams in NFL preseason action 1 Year Ago
- Cómo ver el UFC 241: Daniel Cormier vs. Stipe Miocic 1 Year Ago
- How to live stream UFC 241: Daniel Cormier vs. Stipe Miocic 1 Year Ago
- How to stream Manchester City vs. Tottenham Hotspur Friday 6:59 PM
- QAnon supporters claim they couldn’t sport Q attire at Trump rally Friday 5:52 PM
- How to stream Southampton vs. Liverpool Friday 4:55 PM
- See when and where your team plays: The 2019 NFL preseason schedule Friday 4:51 PM
- Twitter is testing a feature that would hide offensive DMs you receive Friday 4:19 PM
- How to stream Arsenal vs. Burnley Friday 4:15 PM
- The original ‘Four Weddings and a Funeral’ is now streaming on Netflix Friday 3:33 PM
- 2 anime series are translating the controversial phrase ‘lolicon’ to ‘pedophile’ Friday 3:25 PM
- This Four Loko hard seltzer is basically a meme in a can Friday 2:40 PM
- Pete Buttigieg says he’s not in favor of the DH in baseball Friday 2:40 PM
- Amazon’s plan to have warehouse workers defend it backfired beautifully (updated) Friday 2:06 PM
- Senator: Zuckerberg’s testimony ‘incomplete’ after Messenger transcription report Friday 1:18 PM
Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Co.) said on Tuesday he would back the movement in Congress to restore net neutrality rules, becoming the first Republican in the House of Representatives to sign onto an effort that would overturn the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) vote to rescind them last year.
In a statement, Coffman said he would sign onto the discharge petition that would force a vote in the House on a Congressional Review Act (CRA) effort to restore net neutrality rules. A similar CRA passed 52 to 47 in the Senate earlier this summer, and the House’s would also need a simple majority to pass.
As of Tuesday, Coffman’s support brings the number of lawmakers in favor of the effort to 176, making it 42 votes shy of getting a simple majority, according to a list compiled by Battle For The Net. Advocates have staged several in-person protests to try and convince House lawmakers to sign onto the bill.
Should the CRA pass in the House, it would need to be signed by President Donald Trump.
At the same time, Coffman introduced the “21st Century Internet Act,” which would codify several pillars of net neutrality into law. The bill would ban internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking internet access, “throttling” internet access, and paid prioritization, among other things.
It would also create a new title under the Communications Act for broadband internet access.
The lawmaker said his bill would end the “confusion at the FCC” surrounding net neutrality by making “clear rules” and “common sense provisions” a law.
“It is really quite simple,” Coffman said. “You pay your broadband provider for internet access, you don’t pay them to make decisions about internet content. In exchange for your payment, you should get freedom of access without market distorting arrangements.”
Coffman’s decision to sign onto the discharge petition was lauded by net neutrality advocates.
“These open internet protections should have never been taken away in the first place. Any other lawmaker who wants to support net neutrality must follow Rep Coffman’s lead by signing on to the CRA before supporting any other legislation,” Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement. “Any lawmaker who cosponsors Coffman’s bill without signing on to the discharge petition is doing the bidding of Comcast and Verizon and will be seen as an enemy of the free and open internet.”
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who spearheaded the Senate’s net neutrality CRA, also applauded Coffman’s decision.
“I applaud this bipartisan momentum that is building in the House of Representative for my CRA resolution to restore net neutrality rules,” he said in a statement. “I hope more Republicans will join this effort and stand on the side of American families who rely on and overwhelmingly support a free and open internet.”
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).