- Ohio KKK rally met with massive counter-protest and witty signs from local businesses Today 5:06 PM
- Guy who said he stole drugs from MS-13 now says viral story is fake Today 4:07 PM
- Financial service company left 885 million private records exposed online Today 3:13 PM
- Sasha Obama went to prom and Twitter is delighted with the photos Today 2:22 PM
- Jon Voight says Trump is the greatest president since Lincoln in Twitter videos Today 1:31 PM
- #DeleteFacebook gains momentum after the platform refused to remove doctored Nancy Pelosi videos Today 11:58 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ failed women—and it’s a shame on its legacy Today 7:40 AM
- How to use Tor, the network that lets you browse the web anonymously Today 7:30 AM
- How to live stream Devin Haney vs. Antonio Moran on DAZN Today 7:00 AM
- Trump’s transphobic policies are disgusting—but they aren’t new Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Copa del Rey Final online for free Today 5:45 AM
- How to watch the DFB-Pokal final for free Today 5:30 AM
- Curvy Wife Guy drops music video for rap song ‘Chubby Sexy’ Friday 7:33 PM
- A ‘Black Mirror’-inspired miniseries is coming to YouTube via Netflix Latin America Friday 5:56 PM
- Kanye West appears on David Letterman’s Netflix show to talk Trump, TMZ, and Drake Friday 3:27 PM
New House bill would stop companies from punishing you for negative online reviews
This seems like a no-brainer.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday night announced a bill that would prevent companies from punishing people who leave negative reviews online.
The Consumer Review Fairness Act would outlaw terms-of-service clauses that prohibit negative reviews or punish people who leave them. It would immediately nullify any such clauses that are active at the time of its enactment. The Federal Trade Commission would be tasked with enforcing the ban, violations of which would be deemed unfair practices under its founding statute.
State attorneys general and consumer-protection officials would also be allowed to sue offending companies on behalf of their residents.
The legislation is a response to so-called “non-disparagement clauses” in companies’ terms of service, which have drawn consumer groups’ ire in recent years.
In February, a pet-sitting service in Dallas, Texas, sued a couple for $6,700 after they left a negative review on its Yelp page. A hotel in Hudson, New York, came under fire in mid-2014 for a provision in its guest policy that said it would fine customers $500 for leaving negative reviews online. And a gadget and apparel website famously fined two customers $3,500 for a negative review in 2013, leading to a federal lawsuit that ended with the court forcing the site to pay the customers $305,750 in damages.
The House committee’s bill isn’t the first to surface in this congressional session. South Dakota Sen. John Thune (R), who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced a similar bill last September. That same month, California’s governor signed the first state law banning non-disparagement clauses.
In addition to negative product or service reviews, non-disparagement clauses have been used to bar people from speaking ill of their former employers. Federal courts have grown increasingly skeptical of those clauses, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2014 began studying whether they violate free-speech rights protected under the Civil Rights Act.
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.