- Lawsuit alleges YouTube’s unboxing videos are ‘abusive’ ads aimed at kids Sunday 3:48 PM
- Dr. Dre shades Lori Loughlin with Instagram flex about his daughter getting into USC Sunday 3:13 PM
- University of Georgia frat’s racist Snapchat video draws campus outrage Sunday 1:21 PM
- Facing criticism for eating fish, vegan YouTube star Rawvana speaks out Sunday 10:47 AM
- Arnold Schwarzenegger chases mini-pony in new TikTok video Sunday 9:19 AM
- Review: ‘Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice’ is a cut above the rest Sunday 8:00 AM
- Where do 2020 Democratic candidates stand on healthcare? Sunday 7:30 AM
- How to (legally) stream live TV on Kodi Sunday 7:00 AM
- ‘Delhi Crime’ tackles inequality and women’s rights Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 STP 500 at Martinsville Speedway for free Sunday 6:00 AM
- These high school theater kids put on a totally awesome ‘Alien’ play Saturday 3:59 PM
- Behold these photos of Elon Musk, but with Elizabeth Holmes’ eyes Saturday 3:11 PM
- Barbra Streisand gets ‘canceled’ over remarks about Michael Jackson’s alleged victims Saturday 2:09 PM
- Report: Florida man raped Texas teen after posing as Instagram celeb Saturday 12:14 PM
- Lori Loughlin’s daughters, Olivia and Isabella, could be banned from USC forever Saturday 11:46 AM
National Security Letters, a controversial FBI tool, sent back to federal court
NSLs could soon make a comeback
The federal government notched a major legal victory Friday as an appeals court in San Francisco ruled that a lower court had to reconsider a 2013 verdict on secret National Security Letters.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the passage of the USA Freedom Act in June required a district court in California to rehear arguments challenging the constitutionality of NSLs. The letters, which the FBI uses to demand information for national-security investigations, frequently contain nondisclosure passages forbidding their recipients from publicly discussing them.
In a March 2013 case called In re National Security Letter, Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the North District of California ruled that NSLs’ nondisclosure clauses “suffer[ed] from significant constitutional infirmities” and that the government needed to change the statutes authorizing them.
Judge Illston issued an injunction preventing the government from issuing more NSLs, but she immediately stayed the effect of her ruling pending the resolution of the government’s appeal.
The USA Freedom Act, which President Barack Obama signed into law in early June, primarily reformed the National Security Agency’s bulk telephone-records collection program, which the NSA had operated—illegally, according to one federal court—under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act. But the law also made modest changes to National Security Letters, including allowing recipients to share them with their lawyers to formulate a legal challenge. The law did not eliminate the FBI’s ability to insert nondisclosure clauses into the letters.
Still, the USA Freedom Act’s changes were enough to convince the California appeals court that Judge Illston needed to reconsider her ruling. “In light of the significant changes to the statutes,” the court’s three-judge panel wrote, “we conclude that a remand to the district court is appropriate so the district court may address the recipients’ challenges to the revised statutes.”
Earlier Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit remanded a case about the Section 215 program back to the lower court on procedural grounds. The appeals court did not address the district court’s finding that the program violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on general searches.
Photo via Billy Hathorn/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.