- The best gear and gadget gifts for Dad this holiday season 4 Years Ago
- The 10 most important sci-fi films of the 2010s 4 Years Ago
- Netflix advances beyond testosterone-fueled anime with subdued ‘Levius’ Today 6:00 AM
- Influencer accused of selling shirt she was supposed to promote Tuesday 8:42 PM
- Jameela Jamil dragged for comparing reproductive rights to landlord rights Tuesday 6:54 PM
- Trump campaign posts Thanos meme, totally misses point of ‘Endgame’ Tuesday 5:58 PM
- Petition calls for Apple to make a Baby Yoda emoji Tuesday 5:16 PM
- This BTS-Billie Eilish mashup is the most popular tweet of 2019 Tuesday 4:51 PM
- Michelle Wolf embraces vulgarity in ‘Joke Show’ Tuesday 4:24 PM
- Influencer gets 14 years in prison for trying to steal domain name at gunpoint Tuesday 4:14 PM
- ‘Three Days of Christmas’ is a delightfully dark holiday alternative to Hallmark Tuesday 3:55 PM
- The way Trump Jr. holds his own book inspires mockery Tuesday 3:47 PM
- Woman facing backlash for no longer wearing hijab in end of the decade photo Tuesday 3:16 PM
- Report: Consulting firm lied about decreasing violence at Rikers Island jail Tuesday 2:36 PM
- TikTok users are sharing things they thought were ‘ghetto’ as kids Tuesday 2:31 PM
If you thought the Republican establishment was finally getting used to the idea that Donald Trump could become the party’s nominee for president, the National Review would like to set the record straight.
That’s because the conservative magazine, according to CNN, will release on Friday an edition in which it declares that Trump is a threat to conservatism and that it officially opposes his candidacy. Included in the edition will be 22 conservative voices who have written essays to describe why Trump is a bad idea for the party.
As of Thursday night, you also can read it online.
So, who are the 22?
“Donald Trump is a menace to American conservatism who would take the work of generations and trample it underfoot on behalf of a populism as heedless and crude as The Donald himself,” the magazine said in an editorial, via the New York Times.
But not everybody thinks that way. Some reportedly would rather have Trump go forth as the nominee instead of Ted Cruz, who very well could win the Iowa caucus later this month even though he’s maligned by much, if not most, of the party establishment.
“If it came down to Trump or Cruz, there is no question I’d vote for Trump,” 2008 presidential candidate Rudolph W. Giuliani said recently, via the Washington Post. “As a party, we’d have a better chance of winning with him, and I think a lot of Republicans look at it that way.”
Clearly, that’s not an opinion shared by Rich Lowry, the editor of the National Review who reportedly has spent the last few weeks putting together the 22 conservative thinkers in order to make a big stand against Trump.
“This is the time to mobilize,” Lowry said, via Politico. “The establishment is AWOL, or even worse, so it’s up to people who really believe in these ideas and principles, for whom they’re not just talking points or positions of convenience, to set out the marker.”
It’s also interesting that it’s the National Review making such big noise, because its founder is the late William F. Buckley, who Trump used in the last Republican debate to dispel Cruz’s notion that “New York values” was a negative.
Said Trump at the time: “Conservatives actually do come out of Manhattan, including William F. Buckley and others, just so you understand.”
Photo via Gage Skidmore/Flickr (CC BY SA 2.0)
Josh Katzowitz is a staff writer at the Daily Dot specializing in YouTube and boxing. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. A longtime sports writer, he's covered the NFL for CBSSports.com and boxing for Forbes. His work has been noted twice in the Best American Sports Writing book series.