- Twitch streamer’s mom, roommate get into brawl during live broadcast Thursday 8:41 PM
- Top NFL draft pick Nick Bosa scrubs racist, homophobic social media activity Thursday 8:18 PM
- Jared Kushner’s ‘comprehensive immigration plan’ is just 2 bullet points Thursday 8:16 PM
- ‘Lil Billie Xanish’ is the deepfake mashup of Billie Eilish and Lil Xan Thursday 5:10 PM
- Gossip account the Shade Room to launch 3 original series on Instagram Thursday 4:46 PM
- Biden says he asked Obama not to endorse him—but people aren’t buying it Thursday 3:17 PM
- Marvel makes more money than Harry Potter and Star Wars combined Thursday 3:13 PM
- ‘Avengers: Endgame’: Obituaries for the fallen heroes Thursday 2:51 PM
- T-Mobile, Verizon admit most Americans won’t see fast 5G Thursday 1:52 PM
- PlayStation Vue is offering a sweet streaming deal for a limited time Thursday 1:42 PM
- Twitter reportedly worried banning white nationalists would also flag some Republicans Thursday 1:31 PM
- Lawyer of cop in viral assault case calls the crime a ‘Facebook misdemeanor’ Thursday 12:33 PM
- Biden’s ‘all men’-focused announcement gets roasted Thursday 11:49 AM
- Skillshare is offering new users one month of premium for free Thursday 10:44 AM
- Report: Facebook is punishing Black people for talking about racism (updated) Thursday 10:15 AM
Photo via Wikipedia Commons (Public Domain)
PETA says the monkey deserves intellectual property rights.
Last year, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals brought the lawsuit on behalf of Naruto, the crested Sulawesi macaque in the photo, who snapped the pic after picking up photographer David Slater’s camera in 2011. PETA sued Slater for publishing the photo in a book of his, arguing that Naruto holds the copyright of the photo since he was the one to actually take the picture. A judge dismissed the lawsuit in January.
This is just the latest in the legal battle over the photo. Slater initially claimed copyright, but the Wikimedia Foundation put it up on Wikimedia commons, claiming the photo is not copyrightable since it was not actually taken by a person. Slater ultimately failed to get the photo removed, and the U.S. Copyright Office explicitly stated in 2014 that a “a photo taken by a monkey” is a work created by natural elements, and therefore cannot be copyrighted.
Though it seems unlikely that PETA will win this case, it would be a major feather in the cap of activist groups attempting to legally establish personhood for several intelligent animals. Recently, a group called The Nonhuman Rights Project filed a suit to free a 26-year-old chimpanzee named Tommy to live out his days in a sanctuary. The group described Tommy to be “a cognitively complex autonomous legal person with the fundamental legal right not to be imprisoned,” according to the New York Post.
An appeals court will decide if they will uphold the court ruling in Naruto’s case in about a month.
Cynthia McKelvey covered the health and science for the Daily Dot until 2017. She earned a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California Santa Cruz in 2014. Her work has appeared in Gizmodo, Scientific American Mind, and Mic.com.