- Hoodies with fake bullet holes from prominent school shootings spark outrage 2 Years Ago
- Instagram apologizes for censoring pictures of fish 2 Years Ago
- George R.R. Martin clarifies some things about the ‘Game of Thrones’ Targaryen prequel 2 Years Ago
- Bill Mitchell, the Trump-loving QAnon scammer, is pushing ammunition for a civil war Today 11:53 AM
- How to stream Tigres vs. Cruz Azul in the Leagues Cup final Today 11:48 AM
- How to stream Bayern Munich vs. Belgrade Red Star in Champions League action Today 11:36 AM
- HBO Max gains the streaming rights to ‘The Big Bang Theory’ Today 11:30 AM
- Everyone hates this Russian rapper’s pro-Putin music video Today 10:34 AM
- Skull fire logs are here to make you look like a gleeful murderer Today 10:30 AM
- High school cheerleading team put on probation for waving Trump banner during a game Today 10:12 AM
- ‘Battlestar Galactica’ is getting a reboot from the creator of ‘Mr. Robot’ Today 9:17 AM
- Sean Spicer is already alleging judges are out to get him on DWTS Today 8:52 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Jupiter’s Legacy’ loses showrunner halfway through filming Today 7:36 AM
- ‘Disenchantment’ season 2 starts strong but falls into familiar trappings Today 7:00 AM
- Are Ben Shapiro fans organizing against his opponents on Twitter? Today 6:30 AM
Infamous internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom has offered to deliver evidence to Congress which, he claims, will prove that murdered Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was the WikiLeaks source who leaked thousands of party emails in the run up to the 2016 presidential election.
The entrance of Dotcom has helped to further push conspiracy theories surrounding Rich’s murder into the mainstream—even as the victim’s family struggles to push back against attempts to politicize his untimely death.
Dotcom, who famously founded file sharing website MegaUpload, began claiming this week that Rich was the source of the Hillary Clinton campaign emails. Not only that, he claims to have personally known the data analyst.
I'm meeting my legal team on Monday. I will issue a statement about #SethRich on Tuesday. Please be patient. This needs to be done properly.— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) May 20, 2017
The claims play directly into a recently revived conspiracy, propagated predominantly by Fox News and new media organizations on the political right, that the staffer was targeted by Democratic operatives for leaking the emails—rejecting the official U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russian-sponsored hackers had stolen the DNC emails and fed them to WikiLeaks.
Rich was gunned down walking home from a bar in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2016. The Metropolitan Police Department maintains that Rich was killed in a robbery gone wrong, although police say no valuable possessions were stolen from him. With no witnesses or information leads, the case remains unsolved.
Less than two weeks after Rich’s murder, WikiLeaks began to publish the DNC leaks. The information dump contained 44,000 internal emails that caused havoc for the party by reinforcing the narrative that the DNC preferred Clinton over challenger Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). The leaks, which began just before the party’s national convention, resulted in the resignation of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida as the DNC’s chairwoman.
Not only do those who believe the Democrats killed Rich cite the timing of the leaks as suspicious, they also point to WikiLeaks’ offer of $20,000 for information that would lead to the conviction of Rich’s killers. WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, would later repeat that Russia was not the source of the email dumps, and while continuing to mention Rich during his news interviews, Assange refused to confirm nor deny that the staffer was a source.
To date, there is zero available evidence that Rich’s murder has any connection to politics.
WikiLeaks has never disclosed a source. Sources sometimes talk to other parties but identities never emerge from WikiLeaks. #SethRich— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) May 22, 2017
While Dotcom’s Twitter appeal failed to garner congressional interest, his claims were enthusiastically received by Fox News host Sean Hannity. Hannity has also been discussing the Rich conspiracy theory enthusiastically on his show. Dotcom is now set to appear on Hannity’s show on Tuesday.
Hannity’s interest in the story came about when the Rich family’s private investigator, Rod Wheeler, claimed to Fox reporters that information on Rich’s laptop proved he had been communicating with WikiLeaks before his death. Wheeler later backtracked on his claim, after the upsetting family who warned that the claims were “unsubstantiated.”
Wheeler’s explosive Fox interview ran just as a Washington Post scoop, reporting that President Donald Trump had spilled classified information to Russian diplomats, went live.
As White House controversies came to dominate the news cycle, Hannity, an outspoken Trump defender, was compelled by the belief that the liberal establishment was trying to suppress and drown out the truth about Rich’s death. He spent the rest of the week covering what he described as potentially “one of the biggest scandals in American history.”
This has all taken place much to the distress and frustration of the Rich family, who have issued multiple statements to that effect through their spokesman Brad Bauman—whom right-wing media outlets have decried as a Democrat operative who is manipulating the family.
On Sunday, Bauman, infuriated, published a Twitter rant at Hannity, accusing him of a giving mainstream platform to the fringe theory about Rich’s murder, and Dotcom, whom he slammed as a “sociopath.”
If @KimDotcom knew Seth, why wasn't he at funeral? Send flowers? Tell family he was a hero?— Brad Bauman (@bradbaumn) May 21, 2017
Guess what @KimDotcom I don't buy it...think you have an agenda or are a sociopath. Which is it?— Brad Bauman (@bradbaumn) May 21, 2017
Dotcom is currently facing an extradition case from the U.S. over his involvement in MegaUpload as a source of pirated intellectual property. Throughout the past week, amid being in the spotlight over his tweets about Rich, the New Zealander has taken the opportunity to push information about his case.
Perhaps tweets such as this were what triggered Bauman’s questions about the sincerity of Dotcom’s “agenda,” which should become more clear when Dotcom delivers his statement on Rich’s alleged involvement with WikiLeaks.
Of course, conservatives and Trump supporters are not the only Americans susceptible to conspiracy theories. And liberals have begun pushing their own false or unsubstantiated narratives about President Trump and others.
As trust in the media becomes more partisan than ever before, it appears that both major political demographics are on divergent trajectories in terms of narrative. With high-profile public figures, such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, beginning to rally behind conspiratorial fringe narratives like the Rich conspiracy, this disparity is only set to become more radical.
David Gilmour is a reporter who specializes in national politics, internet culture, and technology.