- These cat purses have everything you need (including balls) 4 Months Ago
- Smooth dude gets girl’s number with a ‘choose your own adventure’ RPG on Tinder 4 Months Ago
- Beto O’Rourke reportedly pranked his wife with a ‘verdant turd’ 4 Months Ago
- The Disney-Fox deal is finalized 4 Months Ago
- Beto likes to stand on counters—and there are memes to prove it Today 10:47 AM
- House promises April vote on bill to restore net neutrality rules Today 9:58 AM
- Here’s how many YouTube subscribers Shane Dawson lost for his old bestiality joke Today 9:26 AM
- Drag queen spreads joy to toddler, world with ‘Baby Shark’ performance Today 9:21 AM
- How many ‘chuggas’ should come before choo choo? Today 9:10 AM
- Cory Booker’s weirdly sensual relationship with coffee resurfaces Today 8:31 AM
- Everything you need to know about gaming chat client Discord Today 8:00 AM
- Report: Your Facebook feed is still ripe with fake news Today 7:42 AM
- The 10 best movies based on true stories on Hulu Today 7:00 AM
- Prager University is fighting ‘leftist indoctrination’ on college campuses Today 7:00 AM
- Can ‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3’ recover from its disastrous drama? Today 6:00 AM
Federal prosecutors were responding to a Nov. 16 lawsuit by the nonprofit Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, which demanded any charging documents or indictments relating to Assange be unsealed.
Assange, who has resided at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012 to avoid U.S. extradition, is known to have been under investigation by the department since 2010 when WikiLeaks published thousands of military and diplomatic cables.
News of a sealed federal indictment against the 47-year-old Australian, however, was inadvertently exposed for the first time by the government in documents filed in an unrelated case in Virginia last week, which argued “no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.”
The Justice Department refused to admit in its Monday filing against the lawsuit by free-press advocates that the slip was proof of an indictment while acknowledging the mistake.
“In either event, the government is not required to publicly acknowledge which of those two possibilities happens to be the case with respect to any individual,” Assistant Attorney Gordon Kromberg wrote in the filing. “The First Amendment does not require the government to confirm or deny the existence of criminal charges in this case.”
Another hearing is scheduled for Tuesday.
- What is the dark net? A beginner’s guide
- What you should know about Jerome Corsi, right-wing conspiracy theorist
- The best Donald Trump memes on the internet
David Gilmour is a reporter who specializes in national politics, internet culture, and technology. He previously covered civil liberties, crime, and politics for Vice.