- UPS facing backlash for thanking police after employee killed in shootout Saturday 5:02 PM
- Sanders campaign fires staffer after anti-Semitic, homophobic tweets surface Saturday 3:13 PM
- Brother Nature was attacked, says everyone just watched with phones out Saturday 2:45 PM
- Ryan Reynolds’ gin company hires Peloton wife for ad Saturday 1:24 PM
- Ex-vegan YouTuber accused of fraud after following meat-only diet Saturday 1:11 PM
- The 15 best Disney+ hidden gems and deep cuts Saturday 12:23 PM
- Everyone in GoFundMe scam involving homeless veteran has now pleaded guilty Saturday 12:06 PM
- Boy invites kindergarten class to his adoption–and people are emotional Saturday 11:56 AM
- Reddit links leaked trade deal documents to Russian campaign Saturday 10:44 AM
- How to stream Alistair Overeem vs. Jairzinho Rozenstruik Saturday 8:30 AM
- Amazon sends customers condoms and soap instead of Nintendo Switch Saturday 8:28 AM
- How to live stream Jermall Charlo vs. Dennis Hogan Saturday 8:00 AM
- Apple TV’s ‘Truth Be Told’ is a criminally dull drama Saturday 6:00 AM
- Thousands of Uber users have reported sexual assaults, company says Friday 5:40 PM
- ‘Astronomy Club’ reformats the sketch show Friday 4:58 PM
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that President Donald Trump violated the First Amendment rights of his critics when he blocked Twitter followers because of their political views, according to numerous reports.
Judge Naomi Buchwald made the ruling in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York. She said Trump’s blocking was unconstitutional because the president restricted the seven plaintiffs who criticized him—and were ultimately blocked—on Twitter, a digital space that acts a public forum, the Washington Post reports.
The lawsuit named Trump, former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and White House Director of Social Media Dan Scavino Jr. as defendants.
“Though Twitter is a private (though publicly traded) company that is not government-owned, the President and Scavino nonetheless exercise control over various aspects of the @realDonaldTrump account,” Buchwald wrote.
Buchwald argued against the defense that Trump’s own First Amendment rights “supersede” those he blocked.
“No government official—including the President—is above the law, and all government officials are presumed to follow the law as has been declared,” she wrote.
The lawsuit, brought by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and a group of Twitter users blocked by the president, argued that Trump’s account served as a place where he made “official statements.”
The president has used his Twitter account on numerous occasions to announce government business–including that Christopher Wray was his choice to lead the FBI, the removal of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and the ousting of former Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin.
You can read more about the ruling here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).