- 2020 Democrats refuse to answer our questions about ‘Cats’ Today 4:14 PM
- Belle Delphine’s Instagram account removed after mass reporting campaign Today 4:08 PM
- Mariah Carey refuses old-age FaceApp challenge Today 3:19 PM
- Journalists horrified by consolidation of Gatehouse, Gannett Today 3:12 PM
- Facebook and Google could be tracking you on porn sites Today 1:42 PM
- 7 best sites for psychic love readings Today 1:20 PM
- Driver demonstrates why you always need to read road signs Today 12:58 PM
- Area 51 remix video proves it’s the summer of Lil Nas X Today 12:26 PM
- ‘ICE will come’: Convenience store clerk threatens customers speaking Spanish Today 12:11 PM
- Rand Paul dodges questions about 9/11 Victims Fund, says ‘watch Fox News’ Today 11:51 AM
- Report: ‘Stranger Things’ season 4 to begin shooting in October Today 11:03 AM
- AT&T paid Michael Cohen to consult on net neutrality, FBI documents show Today 9:10 AM
- Mysterio’s ruse changes on a second viewing of ‘Far From Home’ Today 9:06 AM
- Twitter overturns Barrett Brown’s third permanent suspension Today 8:49 AM
- How to live stream Liga MX Today 7:56 AM
Clinton didn’t go so far as to propose a specific policy.
“We need our best minds in the private sector to work with our best minds in the public sector to develop solutions that will both keep us safe and protect our privacy,” the former secretary of state and Democratic presidential frontrunner said at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.
The issue of whether tech companies should add “backdoors” to their products’ encryption—which would ensure that police and intelligence agencies could decrypt suspects’ communications—rose unexpectedly to the forefront of the national-security conversation after the Paris terrorist attacks. Although there is no evidence that the attackers used encryption to hide their planning conversations from authorities, politicians quickly seized on the incident to make their case for backdoors.
“We should take the concerns of law enforcement and counterterrorism professionals seriously.”
Two Senate committees plan to investigate the role that encryption plays in law-enforcement operations, and one of the committee chairmen, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), suggested the need for legislation, possibly to mandate backdoors. FBI Director James Comey renewed his warnings about criminals “going dark” by encrypting their messages, and CIA Director John Brennan suggested that the U.S. needs more expansive surveillance powers.
Despite decades of anti-encryption rhetoric from senior U.S. officials like Comey, who has suggested that companies like Apple are aiding terrorists by implementing encryption that even they cannot break, Clinton on Thursday told Silicon Valley “not to view government as its adversary.”
“We should take the concerns of law enforcement and counterterrorism professionals seriously,” she said.
Clinton’s campaign did not respond to an email asking what, specifically, she thought should be done to address the perceived problem of encryption.
Independent security experts overwhelmingly agree that backdoors and other attempts to guarantee government access to encrypted communications are unfeasible and unwise. They cite the complex technical logistics, the financial cost to U.S. businesses (as consumers flee their products for more secure foreign competitors), and the international precedent that such U.S. policies would set.
Tech companies continue to fiercely oppose attempts to weaken their encryption. In a statement Thursday, the Information Technology Industry Council, a leading tech-industry trade association, said, “Weakening security with the aim of advancing security simply does not make sense.”
Clinton acknowledged in her comments Thursday that there were risks to weakening encryption, citing “legitimate concerns” about “creating new vulnerabilities that bad actors can and would exploit.”
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.