- Camila Cabello must do more about her racist history Today 6:00 AM
- Instagram and Facebook are reportedly blocking queer ads Friday 8:58 PM
- Review: Tyler Perry’s ‘A Fall From Grace’ is both nonsensical and utterly predictable Friday 6:48 PM
- Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? Friday 6:05 PM
- Trump admin celebrates Michelle Obama’s birthday by proposing rollback of her signature initiative Friday 4:01 PM
- TSA apologizes after agent grabs indigenous woman’s braids, says ‘giddyup’ Friday 3:28 PM
- Blue Bell ice cream licker pleads guilty Friday 2:54 PM
- 7 fortune-telling sites for when you’re bored Friday 2:21 PM
- Governor bans sex puns on free condom wrappers Friday 2:16 PM
- Is Justin Bieber’s ‘Yummy’ video secretly about Pizzagate? Friday 1:01 PM
- Woah Vicky rips out her hair in botched cultural appropriation attempt Friday 12:30 PM
- Here’s an exclusive look at ‘Weathering With You’ Friday 11:57 AM
- TikTok dudes are dipping their balls in soy sauce for ‘science’ Friday 11:49 AM
- Pete Buttigieg’s denial of fixing bread prices becomes its own meme Friday 11:10 AM
- Houston Astros get torched with buzzer memes after new revelation Friday 10:41 AM
This bomb graphic tweeted from the White House-controlled Twitter account, @TheIranDeal, was a snarky one. In fact, when the graphic was originally tweeted by @WhiteHouse in early August, Bloomberg‘s resulting headline was “White House Trolls Netanyahu on Iran with Bomb Graphic.”
For comparison, here are the two graphics side-by-side:
The White House took Netanyahu’s threatening image, and used it to present its side of the Iran Deal debate. Is it snarky? Yes. But is it also backed up by facts that build a clear and concise counter-argument? Yes.
The commentary from Gwen Ifill, when she retweeted @TheIranDeal, didn’t have that second part:
Take that, Bibi. https://t.co/V9Gn9vP6xN
— gwen ifill (@gwenifill) September 2, 2015
“Take that, Bibi,” is not turnabout—it’s trash talk. Trash talk isn’t a shocking thing to see in American politics, but the resulting tsunami that’s washing over Ifill’s reputation proves how sensitive the Iran Deal is. This isn’t just American politics.
The Iran Deal combines aspects of religion, politics, and national safety. That is a trifecta that is not to be taken lightly, and especially by professional journalists with an image of objectivity. It’s not a matter in which somebody on a PBS show called NewsHour can use Benjamin Netanyahu’s nickname after the words “Take that.”
Ifill’s tweet has inspired many people to make some trash-talking tweets of their own:
The good news for Gwen Ifill is that Bibi Derangement Syndrome is covered under ObamaCare.
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) September 2, 2015
Ifill claimed she was simply pointing out the White House’s argument for the Iran Deal, but this justification of her tweet was not enough for PBS Ombudsman, Michael Getler, to provide an umbrella for her. He was not happy about the tweet at all, and released the following statement on the Ombudsman page of PBS’s website this week:
One would have to lean way over backwards to give her the benefit of the doubt that she was simply shedding light on the administration’s view of portions of Netanyahu’s arguments. But to personalize it by saying, “Take that, Bibi” is, in my book, inexcusable for an experienced journalist who is the co-anchor of a nightly news program watched by millions of people over the course of any week.
The lesson: If you’re a TV personality whose job is to objectively report the news, do not put trash talk into the Twittersphere in regards to very sensitive subjects. Phrases like “Take that, Bibi” are, for objective reporters, best left said behind closed doors.
Screengrab via PBS NewsHour/YouTube
Joey Keeton is an entertainment writer who reviewed streaming movies, comedies, and TV series for the Daily Dot. He's also written about podcasts, bizarre web culture, and politics.