- Reddit AITA: Man verbally abused partner through cat impersonations Monday 7:18 PM
- Facebook finally lets you kill distracting navigation bar notifications Monday 6:14 PM
- Artist says Thinx underwear campaign ripped off their memes (updated) Monday 5:48 PM
- Google reportedly gathering millions of Americans’ personal health records Monday 5:00 PM
- Trina goes off on Walmart shopper who allegedly called her the ‘N-word’ Monday 4:14 PM
- Bored of Helvetica? iOS users finally have some new font options Monday 4:00 PM
- Amid panic, YouTube says new terms of service won’t impact creators Monday 3:56 PM
- Opposing sides fight to control online narrative over Bolivian ‘coup’ Monday 3:50 PM
- How to sign up for the Disney+ bundle Monday 3:35 PM
- Instagram covers video costs for celebs who don’t get political Monday 3:30 PM
- T.I.’s daughter apparently unfollowed her dad on Instagram after hymen comment Monday 3:26 PM
- Meet ByteDance, the Chinese tech company behind TikTok Monday 3:09 PM
- Everything you need to know about investing app Robinhood Monday 2:44 PM
- How to stream 49ers vs. Seahawks on Monday Night Football Monday 1:43 PM
- Cops cuff Black man for eating sandwich on subway platform Monday 1:29 PM
A bipartisan group of prominent politicians filed several legal briefs on Tuesday in favor of ending political gerrymandering ahead of a highly anticipated Supreme Court case regarding the practice.
The briefs argue in favor of ending gerrymandering, or the drawing of political districts in states to favor one political party over another.
Several Republicans and Democrats including Sen. John McCain (R-Az.), Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R), former Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole, former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) signed onto separate briefs arguing against the practice.
“Americans do not like gerrymandering. They see its mischief, and absent a legal remedy, their sense of powerlessness and discouragement has increased, deepening the crisis of confidence in our democracy,” the brief from McCain and Whitehouse reads. “Partisan gerrymandering has become a tool for powerful interests to distort the democratic process.”
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Gill v. Whitford, a case stemming from Wisconsin after federal judges ruled state lawmakers unconstitutionally drew the boundaries of the state’s districts to favor Republicans. The Supreme Court has never ruled on whether redistricting maps for partisan purposes can be unconstitutional.
While gerrymandering is currently seen as a benefit for Republicans—16 or 17 current Republican seats in the House of Representatives are believed to be the result of gerrymandering, according to one estimate—the practice has been used by both political parties for decades.
However, in modern times, the ability to draw districts in favor of one party has become increasingly sophisticated.
“In recent years the two major political parties, leveraging the technologies of the modern age, have intentionally and systematically excluded each other from state legislatures like never before,” reads another brief signed by dozens of current and former lawmakers. “Democrats rigged the maps in Illinois, Maryland, and Rhode Island, while Republicans did so in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. This was done to entrench one party at the expense of the other, not to enact policy beneficial to the people.”
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Gill v. Whitford on Oct. 3.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).